Abstract:Negative emissions technologies (NETs), especially bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and direct air capture and storage, have been invoked as necessary to achieve the aspirational 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement. However, currently their costs are estimated to be very high, NETs do not seem to offer co-benefits besides mitigating climate change and there are significant concerns regarding possible negative impacts of their large-scale implementation on sustainable development. Costs can vary significantly due to locational factors such as availability of biomass resources and geological storage capacity. It will be up to progressive industrialized countries to take first steps to mobilize the mitigation potential of NETs. In order to understand whether NETs can provide a significant contribution to mitigation, financial incentives are needed that allow implementing the most attractive NET activities at the global scale. We see the market mechanism under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement – colloquially called ‘Sustainable Development Mechanism’ – as a possible cornerstone of such a policy instrument. While initially NETs will not be competitive on the free market, the mechanism can facilitate bilateral financial transfers for NETs, where mitigation units accrue to the financier. We discuss the functions and design elements that an international policy instrument may need to fulfil to successfully mobilize NETs. This includes in particular robust quantification of removed carbon under international oversight and preventing social and environmental conflicts particularly on land and water use by NETs to ensure long-term acceptability. Key policy insights International policy instruments that mobilize negative emissions technologies are inexistent despite most mitigation pathways relying on large-scale NETs implementation later this century.Feasibility of NETs at large-scale is highly uncertain due to high expected costs and political economy challenges. Practical experience is necessary for better understanding feasibility.For cost-effective global deployment of NETs, a policy instrument would need to mobilize international financial flows and implement safeguards concerning sustainable development impacts.The sustainable development mechanism established in Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement could be a good basis for this if it includes a robust approach to evaluating sustainable development impacts building on the sustainable development goals. International policy instruments that mobilize negative emissions technologies are inexistent despite most mitigation pathways relying on large-scale NETs implementation later this century. Feasibility of NETs at large-scale is highly uncertain due to high expected costs and political economy challenges. Practical experience is necessary for better understanding feasibility. For cost-effective global deployment of NETs, a policy instrument would need to mobilize international financial flows and implement safeguards concerning sustainable development impacts. The sustainable development mechanism established in Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement could be a good basis for this if it includes a robust approach to evaluating sustainable development impacts building on the sustainable development goals.

Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed

Biophysical and Economic Limits to Negative CO2 Emissions

Laying the foundations for negative emissions technologies: insights from a workshop

Model-based scenarios for achieving net negative emissions in the food system

Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways

Negative Emissions Physically Needed to Keep Global Warming below 2 °C

Towards Indicators for a Negative Emissions Climate Stabilisation Index: Problems and Prospects

The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design

How to Spend a Dwindling Greenhouse Gas Budget

Simulating the Earth System Response to Negative Emissions

Sustainable scale-up of negative emissions technologies and practices: where to focus

A case for promoting negative emission technologies: learning from renewable energy support

The carbon dioxide removal gap

Moving toward Net-Zero Emissions Requires New Alliances for Carbon Dioxide Removal

Investigating the socio-political acceptance of negative emission technologies: A group model building approach

European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities

Net Zero: Science, Origins, and Implications

Reducing sectoral hard-to-abate emissions to limit reliance on carbon dioxide removal

Prioritizing Non-Carbon Dioxide Removal Mitigation Strategies Could Reduce the Negative Impacts Associated with Large-Scale Reliance on Negative Emissions

Sustainable negative emissions in Europe: Evaluating scenarios to meet carbon neutrality by 2050

Global roll-out of comprehensive policy measures may aid in bridging emissions gap