Abstract:As a new natural resource management tool based on financial incentives, payment for ecosystem services (PES) plays a vital role in balancing socio-economic development and ecological protection. China’s Sloping land conversion program (SLCP) is one of the most expensive PES programs in the world, and its implementation effectiveness has received much attention. However, the complex mechanism by which project implementation affects socio-economic development and ecosystem services remains elusive. To reveal the interaction pathways between PES programs, socio-economic development, and the natural environment, Loess Plateau, a key region for SLCP implementation in China, was selected as the subject of this study. Furthermore, the RUSLE model was adopted to evaluate the changes in soil conservation services between 2000 and 2015. Based on the Structural equation model (SEM), the links between SLCP, agricultural development, population transfer, urbanization, natural environment, and ecosystem services were investigated. The results showed that the soil conservation services in Loess Plateau were significantly improved after SLCP implementation, with a total increase of 13.88 × 108 t from 2000 to 2015. The long-term socio-economic impact of SLCP was not significant, except for the first stage of SLCP implementation where agricultural development was inhibited. The implementation of SLCP directly improved soil conservation services and improved soil conservation services through through its indirect effect on agricultural development. We also found that the different stages of SLCP implementation had different effects on the improvement of soil conservation services. The efficiency of the second stage was higher than that of the first stage. Socio-economic factors and natural environmental conditions had negative effects on soil conservation services. In addition, the socio-economic effects of SLCP implementation varied at different stages. Based on the study results, we suggest that the subsequent SLCP implementation should focus on maintaining the results, and the impact of different socio-economic factors should be considered. This study provides a framework for a better understanding of the complex mechanisms through which SLCP affects socio-economic, ecosystem services, and natural conditions.

Impact of the Expiration of the SLCP Subsidy on Farmers' Income and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Hebei Province, China

Does participation in the sloping land conversion program reduce the sensitivity of Chinese farmers to climate change?

Impacts of Sloping Land Conversion Program on Households' Sustainable Livelihood

Program Sustainability and the Determinants of Farmers’ Self-Predicted Post-Program Land Use Decisions: Evidence from the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) in China

Value Perception, Government Regulation, and Farmers' Behavior toward Continuing to Maintain the Sloping Land Conversion Program

Alternatives or status quo? Improving fallow compensation policy in heavy metal polluted regions in Chaling County, China

Pathways from the Payment for Ecosystem Services Program to Ecological and Socio-Economic Outcomes

The Impact Factors on Farmers' Willingness to Accept Compensation for Land Fallow from a Perspective of Household Differentiation: A Case Study of Jiashan County

Incomplete Property Rights, Exposure to Markets and the Provision of Environmental Services in China

Simulating study on the performance of grain subsidy policies based on a household model

The Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Farmers’ Well-Being and Its Mechanism—Empirical Analysis Based on CLDS Data

Relaxing Rural Constraints: a ‘Win-Win’ Policy for Poverty and Environment in China?

Coupling Farmer Livelihood and Ecosystem Conservation in the Rural Community of Northwest China

The Impact of Rural Land Right on Farmers' Income in Underdeveloped Areas: Evidence from Micro-survey Data in Yunnan Province, China

How China's Ecological Compensation Policy Improves Farmers' Income?—A Test of Environmental Effects

Subsidies and distortions in China's agriculture: Evidence from producer-level data

Is It Sustainable to Implement a Regional Payment for Ecosystem Service Programme for 10 Years? An Empirical Analysis From the Perspective of Household Livelihoods

The Effectiveness Assessment of Agricultural Subsidy Policies on Food Security: Evidence from China's Poverty-Stricken Villages

Livelihood-environment Trade-off under the Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) at Decadal Scale in Northwest China

The Subsidization of Farming Households in China’s Agriculture

Farm households? willingness to participate in China?s Grain-for-Green Program under different compensation scenarios