Abstract:Traded corporations are required by law to have a majority of outside directors on their board. This requirement allows the existence of directors who sit on the board of two or more corporations at the same time, generating what is commonly known as interlocking directorates. While research has shown that networks of interlocking directorates facilitate the transmission of information between corporations, little is known about the extent to which such interlocking networks can explain the fluctuations of stock price returns. Yet, this is a special concern since the risk of amplifying stock fluctuations is latent. To answer this question, here we analyze the board composition, traders' perception, and stock performance of more than 1500 US traded corporations from 2007-2011. First, we find that the fewer degrees of separation between two corporations in the interlocking network, the stronger the temporal correlation between their stock price returns. Second, we find that the centrality of traded corporations in the interlocking network correlates with the frequency at which financial traders talk about such corporations, and this frequency is in turn proportional to the corresponding traded volume. Third, we show that the centrality of corporations was negatively associated with their stock performance in 2008, the year of the big financial crash. These results suggest that the strategic decisions made by interlocking directorates are strongly followed by stock analysts and have the potential to correlate and amplify the movement of stock prices during financial crashes. These results may have relevant implications for scholars, investors, and regulators.

Director networks and firm value

How Much Do Directors Influence Firm Value?

Interlocking Directorate,Financial Performance and Firm Value

Stock fluctuations are correlated and amplified across networks of interlocking directorates

Interlocking Directorate and Firm’s Diversification Strategy: Perspective of Strategy Learning

Do Investors Care About Director Tenure? Insights from Executive Cognition and Social Capital Theories

Director Networks, Political Connections, and Earnings Quality in Malaysia

Essays on Microeconomic Applications in Political Economy and Business Strategy

Board Interlock Networks and the Use of Relative Performance Evaluation

The Value of Academics: Evidence From Academic Independent Director Resignations in China

Ties that bind: exploring corporate networks, decision-making dynamics in the financial market, labor-management relations, and organizational performance

Social capital, independent director connectedness, and stock price crash risk

Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China

Departures of Tainted Outside Directors: A Threshold Approach from Two Competing Theoretical Perspectives

Identifying Board of Director Network Influence for Firm Characteristics

Do Professional Ties Enhance Board Seat Prospects of Independent Directors with Tainted Reputations?

Busy Boards, Entrenched Directors and Corporate Innovation

Network Centrality and Dissent Voting by Directors on Boards

Do politically connected independent directors create or destroy value

Returnee Directors and Cost of Debt

Board Interlock Networks and Informed Short Sales