To get good data quality or study sadistic people? Are "inattentive responders" actually sadistic?

Charlotte K. Cease,William Hart,Braden T. Hall,Joshua T. Lambert,Danielle E. Wahlers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112569
IF: 3.95
2024-02-04
Personality and Individual Differences
Abstract:Researchers typically eliminate inattentive participants; however, when researchers assess inattention with "lie scales," which assess preposterous responding, they may remove personality variance associated with tendencies to be preposterous. We examined this idea in the context of the Dark Tetrad (D4), which includes sadism, psychopathy , Machiavellianism, and narcissism. Based in prior work on the D4 and lying, we speculated that variance unique to sadism and psychopathy would predict greater preposterous responding on lie scales. Participants ( N = 271) completed indices of the D4 and a popular lie scale (i.e., preposterous responding). The findings were partially as anticipated: Only variance unique to sadism, but no other D4 construct, positively predicted preposterous responding. Hence, researchers that study sadism are faced with a Catch 22: By eliminating people who respond preposterously, they are, to some extent, excluding individuals who are often underrepresented in their (nonclinical) sample.
psychology, social
What problem does this paper attempt to address?