Abstract:Background Radiation therapy (RT)-associated oral mucositis, xerostomia, thick mucoid saliva, nausea/vomiting, and loss of taste may result in significantly compromised oral intake in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancers (HNC). Feeding tube placement allows patients to receive enteral nutrition and continue the planned course of treatment. Objectives RT-associated oral mucositis, xerostomia, and loss of taste may result in significantly compromised oral intake in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancers. We sought to determine if reactive nasogastric (NG) tube placement was an effective strategy for nutritional support in these patients and if invasive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion could be avoided. Methods This is an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study of patients treated for head and neck cancer using definitive or adjuvant RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy between June 2017 and December 2020. We evaluated the indications for NG tube (Dobhoff) placement, time of placement during the course of RT, patient tolerance of NG tube, and median duration of NG tube placement. In addition, we followed weight loss during treatment, treatment interruptions, and treatment-related toxicities. Complications associated with having the NG tube, if the NG tube needed to be replaced during treatment, and if the patient had any hospitalization during the course of treatment were tracked. Results Of the 441 patients treated for head and neck cancer during the time period of this study, 47 required reactive NG tube placement for nutritional support. Patients included 40 with primary oropharynx, three with oral cavity, two with larynx, one with nasopharyngeal, and one was unknown. Chemotherapy was given concurrently with radiation in 87.2% (n=41) patients. The median time of NG tube placement was during Week 5 of the six to seven-week course of RT. The median percentage of weight loss from baseline to the date of NG tube placement was 12.9% (range, -0.9% to 25.9%). The median rate of weight loss decreased by 8.7% from the date of NG tube placement to the end of treatment. The median duration of NG tube placement was 29 days (range, 5 to 151 days). There were no serious medical complications associated with having the NG tube in place during treatment. Twenty-seven point six percent (27.6%; n=13) of patients had the NG tube dislodged or displaced and needed replacement. Thirty-eight point three percent (38.3%; n=18) of patients with an NG tube had to be hospitalized during the course of RT, with the predominant symptoms being failure to thrive (22.2%; n=4) and nausea/vomiting 22.2% (n=4). Six point four percent (6.4%; n=3) of patients requested the removal of the NG tube due to local irritation. Seventy-six point six percent (76.6%; n=36) of patients did not require further nutritional support with the placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Conclusion This study indicates that clinic placement of an NG tube for patients receiving RT for head and neck cancer is a safe and effective way to maintain nutrition during treatment. The rate of weight loss decreased after the patient had an NG tube placed. The placement procedure is well-tolerated and there were no complications associated with having the NG tube during treatment. PEG tube insertion was avoided in approximately 80% of the patients.

Nasogastric tube feeding improves nutritional status and physical state in esophageal cancer patients during chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

Study for early postoperative enteral nutrition via nasointestinal tube for patients with oral cancer

Multidisciplinary nutritional management improves nutritional and hospitalized outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: A randomized control trial

How enteral nutrition modes influence nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors with late dysphagia after radiotherapy: a randomized controlled study

Clinical application and research of abdominal retrograde gastric and jejunal feeding tube

Enteral Nutrition for Progressive Gastric Cancer Patients with Pyloric Obstruction

Enteral nutrition for esophageal cancer patients with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Effects of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: a Prospective Study

Influence of Enteral Nutrition on Nutritional Status, Treatment Toxicities, and Short-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study

Comparative Effects Of Different Enteral Feeding Methods In Head And Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy Or Chemoradiotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Effects of Enteral Nutrition on Patients With Oesophageal Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Study

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Benefits of Oral Nutritional Supplements in Patients with Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: an Exploratory Prospective Randomized Trial

Nasogastric Feeding Tube/Dobhoff Placement: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Malnutrition During Radiation Therapy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Nutritional support in progressive gastric cancer patients with obstruction during the neoadjuvant chemothearpy

Clinical Outcomes Comparing Parenteral and Nasogastric Tube Nutrition After Laryngeal and Pharyngeal Cancer Surgery

Effect of oral supplements on the nutritional status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy: A randomized controlled Phase II trial

Impact of nutritional intervention on concurrent chemoradiotherapy outcomes in locally advanced esophageal cancer: A pharmacological perspective

A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study of Nutritional Status in Locally Advanced Nasopharynx Cancer Treated by Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy

Benefit of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Patients Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Nutrition intervention in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy