Abstract:The ability to determine how many objects are involved in physical events is fundamental for reasoning about the world that surrounds us. Previous studies suggest that infants can fail to individuate objects in ambiguous occlusion events until their first birthday and that learning words for the objects may play a crucial role in the development of this ability. The present eye-tracking study tested whether the classical object individuation experiments underestimate young infants' ability to individuate objects and the role word learning plays in this process. Three groups of 6-month-old infants (N = 72) saw two opaque boxes side by side on the eye-tracker screen so that the content of the boxes was not visible. During a familiarization phase, two visually identical objects emerged sequentially from one box and two visually different objects from the other box. For one group of infants the familiarization was silent (Visual Only condition). For a second group of infants the objects were accompanied with nonsense words so that objects' shape and linguistic labels indicated the same number of objects in the two boxes (Visual & Language condition). For the third group of infants, objects' shape and linguistic labels were in conflict (Visual vs. Language condition). Following the familiarization, it was revealed that both boxes contained the same number of objects (e.g. one or two). In the Visual Only condition, infants looked longer to the box with incorrect number of objects at test, showing that they could individuate objects using visual cues alone. In the Visual & Language condition infants showed the same looking pattern. However, in the Visual vs Language condition infants looked longer to the box with incorrect number of objects according to linguistic labels. The results show that infants can individuate objects in a complex object individuation paradigm considerably earlier than previously thought and that linguistic cues enforce their own preference in object individuation. The results are consistent with the idea that when language and visual information are in conflict, language can exert an influence on how young infants reason about the visual world.

Infants' individuation of human faces across race and identity

The effect of familiarity on infants’ social categorization capacity

Development of category formation for faces differing by age in 9- to 12-month-olds: An effect of experience with infant faces

Face Processing in Infancy and Beyond: The Case of Social Categories

Shape, color and the other-race effect in the infant brain

How Infants Direct Their Gaze to Faces in the Presence of Other Objects: The Development of Face Preference Between 4 and 7 Months After Birth

When novelty prevails on familiarity: Visual biases for child versus infant faces in 3.5- to 12-month-olds

Perceptual Narrowing in Speech and Face Recognition: Evidence for Intra-individual Cross-Domain Relations

Endogenous Control and Reward-based Mechanisms Shape Infants' Attention Biases to Caregiver Faces

Infant Eye Gaze While Viewing Dynamic Faces

Infants' Preference for ID Speech in Face and Voice Extends to a Non‐Native Language

How race and age experiences shape young children's face processing abilities

Object individuation and labelling in 6-month-old infants

Cortical Face-Selective Responses Emerge Early in Human Infancy

Event-related potential correlates of implicit processing of own- and other-race faces in children

Electrophysiological decoding captures the temporal trajectory of face categorization in infants

Individuating and categorizing faces: The other-race effect is reduced by attending to racial but not identity cues

Perceptual narrowing in face- and speech-perception domains in infancy: A longitudinal approach

Infant Understanding of Different Forms of Social Exclusion

Infants can use temporary or scant categorical information to individuate objects