Abstract:Abstract Background Clinical practice guidelines have become increasingly widely used to guide quality improvement of clinical practice. Qualitative research may be a useful way to improve the quality and implementation of guidelines. The methodology for qualitative evidence used in guidelines development is worthy of further research. Methods A comprehensive search was made of WHO, NICE, SIGN, NGC, RNAO, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP from January 1, 2011 to February 25, 2020. Guidelines which met IOM criteria and were focused on clinical questions using qualitative research or qualitative evidence, were included. Four authors extracted significant information and entered this onto data extraction forms. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool was used to evaluate the guidelines’ quality. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 and R version 3.3.2. Results Sixty four guidelines were identified. The overall quality of the guidelines was high (almost over 60%). Domain 1 (Scope and Purpose) was ranked the highest with a median score of 83% (IQ 78–83). Domain 2 (Stakeholder involvement) and Domain 5 (Applicability) were ranked the lowest with median scores of 67% (IQ 67–78) and 67% (IQ 63–73) respectively. 20% guidelines used qualitative research to identify clinical questions. 86% guidelines used qualitative evidence to support recommendations (mainly based on primary studies, a few on qualitative evidence synthesis). 19% guidelines applied qualitative evidence when considering facilitators and barriers to recommendations’ implementation. 52% guideline developers evaluated the quality of the primary qualitative research study using the CASP tool or NICE checklist for qualitative studies. No guidelines evaluated the quality of qualitative evidence synthesis to formulate recommendations. 17% guidelines presented the level of qualitative research using the grade criteria of evidence and recommendation in different forms such as I, III, IV, very low. 28% guidelines described the grades of the recommendations supported by qualitative and quantitative evidence. No guidelines described the grade of recommendations only supported by qualitative evidence. Conclusions The majority of the included guidelines were high-quality. Qualitative evidence was mainly used to identify clinical questions, support recommendations, and consider facilitators and barriers to implementation of recommendations’. However, more attention needs to be paid to the methodology. For example, no experts proficient in qualitative research were involved in guideline development groups, no assessment of the quality of qualitative evidence synthesis was included and there was lack of details reported on the level of qualitative evidence or grade of recommendations.

Time delay and evidence profiles forming clinical recommendations of US surgical society guidelines

Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guideline Development Scheme: An Overview of Evidence Quality Assessment Methods, Evidence to Decision Frameworks, and Reporting Standards in Guideline Development

Efficiency based updating of evidence based surgical guidelines - Experiences from a multidisciplinary guideline upon Minimally Invasive Surgery

Moving toward the Development and Effective Implementation of High-Quality Guidelines in Pediatric Surgery: A Review of the Literature

Investigation and Evaluation of Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Published in Medical Journals in 2019: Analysis of the Evidence

Importance and Presence of High-Quality Evidence for Clinical Decisions in Neurosurgery: International Survey of Neurosurgeons

Surgeon views regarding the adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: systematic review

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: health equity update to standard operating procedure

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

Analysis of the Status and Trends of Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline Development Between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Review

Recommendations from the ERAS® Society for standards for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines

Translation of acute coronary syndrome therapies: from evidence to routine clinical practice

The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery

Perioperative patient safety recommendations: best practices derived from a systematic review and a multidisciplinary expert consensus

The evidence mismatch in pediatric surgical practice

Evidence-informed guidelines in oral health: insights from a systematic survey

Socioeconomic factors influence surgical wait times for non-emergent gynecologic surgical procedures: a retrospective analysis

Trends in the development process of clinical practice guidelines: a questionnaire survey for the guideline development groups in Japan

An exploration of how developers use qualitative evidence: content analysis and critical appraisal of guidelines

Introduction to the Key Contents of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery Practice Guideline 2021

Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews