Abstract:One‐dimensional site response analysis (1D SRA) remains the standard practice in considering the effect of local soil deposits and predicting site‐specific ground motions, although its range of applicability to realistic seismic wavefields is still in question. In this 1D approach, horizontal and vertical ground shaking are assumed to be induced by vertically propagating shear and compressional waves, respectively. A recent study based on analytical two‐dimensional (2D) plane waves and simple point source earthquake simulations has shown two mechanistic limitations in this 1D modelling technique for general inclined seismic waves, that is, systematic over‐prediction of the vertical motion and wave trapping in the 1D soil column. In this article, we evaluate in detail the applicability of this 1D modelling approach to realistic three‐dimensional (3D) simulated seismic wavefields in shallow sedimentary basins. Linear‐viscoelastic 1D SRA predictions using two types of input motions that are commonly used in practice—rock outcrop and in‐column motions, are compared with the reference true site response results from 3D earthquake simulations in terms of various measures in the frequency and time domain. It is shown that the horizontal motion in the 3D seismic wavefield exhibits dominant shear wave propagation phenomenon, while the vertical motion is a combined effect of compressional and shear waves and can be over‐predicted by the 1D approach when the incident seismic waves are inclined. Direct evidence of the wave refraction process that leads to the vertical motion over‐prediction is provided. 1D SRA with in‐column inputs can yield motions that have significantly longer duration compared to the true 3D site response solution due to trapped waves, casting in doubt the frequent need for increased soil damping in existing site studies to compensate for wave attenuation due to scattering alone. Sensitivity investigation on the increase of soil profile damping by a multiplier Dmul shows Dmul values compatible with those found in the literature for both horizontal and vertical motions. It is shown that the level of Dmul optimized for a best match of the spectral acceleration is dependent on the characteristic of the input motion and a larger Dmul is typically required for the vertical component. In contrast, 1D SRA with outcrop motions predicts motions with shorter significant duration due to its inability to capture the basin‐edge generated surface waves. A suite of ground motion simulations was performed to assess the sensitivity of the observations to the basin geologic structure including the velocity gradient, rock‐basin impedance contrast and basin depth. The analysis results show that the accuracy of the simplified 1D procedure is dependent on the wavefield composition of both the input motions and the true 3D site response solution. While the horizontal motions in shallow sedimentary basins can, to the first order, be reasonably captured by the simplified 1D approach, 1D SRA for the vertical component is in general not reliable and contributions from inclined shear waves should be accounted for in site‐specific evaluation of the vertical design ground motion.

Deep soil seismic hazard assessment: analyzing the impact of local site effects by stochastic site response analysis—a comparative approach

Quantifying the role of logic tree parameters in soil probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: Insights from sensitivity analysis

Probability Analysis of Submarine Landslides Based on the Response Surface Method: A Case Study from the South China Sea

Probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Stability of a Rock Slope by Combining the Simulation of Stochastic Ground Motion with Permanent Displacement Analysis

Efficient Reliability Analysis of Slopes Integrating the Random Field Method and a Gaussian Process Regression‐based Surrogate Model

Probabilistic Analysis of Underground Rock Excavations Using Response Surface Method and SORM

Applicability of 1D site response analysis to shallow sedimentary basins: A critical evaluation through physics‐based 3D ground motion simulations

Impact of seismotectonic source zoning and seismic parameter: Sensitivity study on probabilistic seismic hazard assessment

Reliability analysis and risk assessment of pile-reinforced slopes considering spatial soil variability and site investigation

Reliability Analysis of Deep Excavation Based on Field Monitoring Data

Physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment using synthetic ground motions: application to the stable continental region of India

Development of a probabilistic seismic microzonation software considering geological and geotechnical uncertainties

Seismic Reliability Analysis of an Excavation Slope Based on Direct Probability Integral Method

Multi-site Seismic Risk Analysis Based on Probabilistic Scenarios

An Efficient Simulation-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis Method

Time-Dependent Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Seismic Sequences Based on Hybrid Renewal Process Models

System reliability analysis of soldier-piled excavation in unsaturated soil by combining random finite element and sequential compounding methods

Uncertainty Propagation of Soil Property in Dynamic Site Response under Different Site Conditions

A Practical Approach of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Vector IMs Regarding Mainshock with Potentially Largest Aftershock

MCS‐Based PSHA Procedure and Generation of Site‐Specific Design Spectra for the Seismicity Characteristics of China

Probabilistic stability analysis of embankment slopes considering the spatial variability of soil properties and seismic randomness