Abstract:BackgroundOver‐sedation, delirium and immobilisation in the intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with increased length of stay (LOS) in the unit. Routines of systematic pain and sedation assessment and the use of valid tools are highly stressed in international guidelines. For improving the quality of pain treatment and sedation in a Norwegian ICU, in 2009–2015, we compared supplementation with an analgo‐sedation approach and the existing systematic approach, measured by the adherence to current international pain, sedation and delirium guidelines. MethodsIn a longitudinal study following the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), pain, sedation, delirium and mobilisation data from patients' complete ICU stays, encompassing three separate periods of 4–6 months, were compared. The primary outcome was adherence to current protocol including assessment and documentation of patients' level of pain, sedation and prevalence of delirium at least every 8 hours, early mobilization, and titration towards a light level of sedation. ResultsWe included 205 patients, corresponding to 1607 patient ICU days. The patient sedation levels, measured by the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS), decreased significantly, from −2.2 in 2009 to −1.7 in 2015, so did the amount of administrated propofol. Mean pain‐scores measured by the numeric rating scale during activity were maximum 3.1 in 2014, decreasing to 2.2 in 2015. In patients not able to self‐report, pain mean scores were 1.7 in 2014 and 1.6 in 2015, measured by the Critical Care Pain Observational Tool. The number of patients unable to assess (UTA) for delirium decreased significantly. By discounting the group of patients UTA, the prevalence of delirium varied from 32%, 25% and 33%. ConclusionThe goal of having an awake patient able to cooperate, with acceptable levels of pain, was gradually achieved during a 6‐year period. The results showed that pain treatment and sedation in the ICU primarily succeeded in the setting of an established routine of systematic assessment and documentation. Relevance to clinical practiceThe results of the study draw attention to pain treatment, sedation and delirium in intensive care patients, as well as implementation strategies aimed at achieving healthcare personnel's adherence to international guidelines in clinical practice. ImpactPursuing the goal of keeping critically ill patients comfortable—as well as awake and cooperative during ICU treatment—is safe when healthcare personnel adhere to the recommended clinical guidelines on pain treatment, sedation and delirium. The current clinical guidelines contribute to achieving a balance in patient‐centred care for critically ill patients among pain treatment, sedation and delirium in ICU patients.

How should respiratory depression and loss of airway patency be handled during initiation of palliative sedation?

Palliative sedation – revised recommendations

The Decision-Making Process for Palliative Sedation for Patients with Advanced Cancer–Analysis from a Systematic Review of Prospective Studies

Guidelines on analgosedation, monitoring, and recovery time for flexible bronchoscopy: a systematic review

[New recommendations on palliative sedation]

Management of analgosedation during noninvasive respiratory support: an expert Delphi consensus document developed by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)

Limiting sedation for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - time to wake up

Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS

Optimal Sedation and Pain Management: A Patient- and Symptom-Oriented Paradigm

Impact of Respiratory Compromise in Inpatient Interventional Radiology Procedures with Moderate Sedation in the United States

Sedation from analgesics: patient preference survey

Survey of sedation practices during noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure

Comparison of sedation strategies for critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses

Level of sedation in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Revised European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework on palliative sedation: An international Delphi study

Movements and trends in intensive care pain treatment and sedation: What matters to the patient?

Paediatric emergency front-of-neck airway: issues of ethics, law, and philosophy

Analgesia and Sedation Use During Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure

Ethics Consult: Using Hospice as "Treatment" for Behavioral Problems of Dementia

Sedation practices in palliative care services across France: a nationwide point-prevalence analysis

Reviewing Ethical Guidelines for the Care of Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders after 30 Years: Rethinking Our Approach at a Time of Transition