Movements and trends in intensive care pain treatment and sedation: What matters to the patient?

Hilde Wøien
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15179
2020-01-21
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Abstract:BackgroundOver‐sedation, delirium and immobilisation in the intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with increased length of stay (LOS) in the unit. Routines of systematic pain and sedation assessment and the use of valid tools are highly stressed in international guidelines. For improving the quality of pain treatment and sedation in a Norwegian ICU, in 2009–2015, we compared supplementation with an analgo‐sedation approach and the existing systematic approach, measured by the adherence to current international pain, sedation and delirium guidelines. MethodsIn a longitudinal study following the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), pain, sedation, delirium and mobilisation data from patients' complete ICU stays, encompassing three separate periods of 4–6 months, were compared. The primary outcome was adherence to current protocol including assessment and documentation of patients' level of pain, sedation and prevalence of delirium at least every 8 hours, early mobilization, and titration towards a light level of sedation. ResultsWe included 205 patients, corresponding to 1607 patient ICU days. The patient sedation levels, measured by the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS), decreased significantly, from −2.2 in 2009 to −1.7 in 2015, so did the amount of administrated propofol. Mean pain‐scores measured by the numeric rating scale during activity were maximum 3.1 in 2014, decreasing to 2.2 in 2015. In patients not able to self‐report, pain mean scores were 1.7 in 2014 and 1.6 in 2015, measured by the Critical Care Pain Observational Tool. The number of patients unable to assess (UTA) for delirium decreased significantly. By discounting the group of patients UTA, the prevalence of delirium varied from 32%, 25% and 33%. ConclusionThe goal of having an awake patient able to cooperate, with acceptable levels of pain, was gradually achieved during a 6‐year period. The results showed that pain treatment and sedation in the ICU primarily succeeded in the setting of an established routine of systematic assessment and documentation. Relevance to clinical practiceThe results of the study draw attention to pain treatment, sedation and delirium in intensive care patients, as well as implementation strategies aimed at achieving healthcare personnel's adherence to international guidelines in clinical practice. ImpactPursuing the goal of keeping critically ill patients comfortable—as well as awake and cooperative during ICU treatment—is safe when healthcare personnel adhere to the recommended clinical guidelines on pain treatment, sedation and delirium. The current clinical guidelines contribute to achieving a balance in patient‐centred care for critically ill patients among pain treatment, sedation and delirium in ICU patients.
nursing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?