Abstract:Background/Introduction The treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) with pulsed field ablation (PFA) aims to prevent AF recurrence while reducing complications from the ablation modality. Similar to thermal ablation, PFA has proven to be safe and effective for treatment of paroxysmal AF (PAF); however, there is scarce evidence on patient-related clinical benefits, including healthcare utilization, using this new energy modality. Purpose The objective of this study is to assess long-term clinical improvements in patient care, symptoms, and quality-of-life (QOL) after PFA ablation in PAF. Methods InspIRE was a multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of variable loop PFA catheters integrated with a 3D mapping system for treatment of symptomatic PAF. Patients were followed for up to 12 months for the following QOL and healthcare utilization endpoints: Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) score, Class I/III AAD utilization, repeat ablation, incidence of direct current cardioversion (DCCV), and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization. Post-hoc Kaplan-Meier estimates for clinical benefit success at 12 months were provided. Success was defined as composite freedom from occurrence of the following events post-blanking: repeat ablation, CV hospitalization, AAD utilization, and DCCV post-blanking. Predictors of clinical benefit success were explored via multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 186 enrolled patients (59±10 years; 70.0% male; CHA2DS2-VASC score 1.3±1.2) underwent PVI. Compared to baseline: 1) improvements in the AFEQT composite score were seen at 12 months (P<0.001); 2) Class I/III AAD use was reduced from 81.7% to 20.1% at 6-12 months (P<0.05); and 3) the proportion of subjects with DCCV decreased from 13.7% up to 12 months before the index procedure to 3.3% up to 12 months after the index procedure (P<0.001, Figure 1). Minimal clinically important difference in QoL (≥5 points improvement in AFEQT) was achieved in 85.2% of patients. Patients free from 12-month AF/AT/AFL recurrence (asymptomatic and symptomatic) had significantly greater improvements in AFEQT scores from baseline to 12 months versus those with recurrence (P=0.01). The clinical benefit success rate at 12 months was 87.5% (Figure 2). Patients who failed the clinical benefit endpoint were counted, including those with repeat ablation (7.5%), those on new or higher dose of AAD (6.5%), those hospitalized for CV (4.8%), and those who had DCCV post-blanking (1.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that left ventricle ejection fraction <60% (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08-0.62; P<0.05) and incidence of diabetes (OR: 7.25; 95% CI: 2.00, 26.3; p<0.05) were associated with a higher risk of clinical benefit failure. Conclusions PFA ablation of PAF patients led to a clinical benefit success rate of 87.5%, with clinically meaningful improvement in QOL, as well as a reductions in AAD use, cardioversion, and hospitalization.Figure 1.Improvements in QoL and HealthFigure 2.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Time

Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation with a novel simplified protocol: the Swiss PFA dose multicenter study

Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy

Pulsed-field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation: acute safety, efficacy and short-term follow-up in a multi-center real world scenario

Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients: a single centre experience

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation vs. high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up (PRIORI study)

Efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation vs. novel cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation

Feasibility study on atrial fibrillation ablation with pulsed field ablation and concomitant occlusion of the left atrial appendage

Left atrial substrate modification for persistent atrial fibrillation and left atrial macro or microreentrant tachycardia using a single-shot pulsed field ablation system - a single centre case series

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Pulsed Field Ablation as First-line Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Substudy of the EU-PORIA Registry

Safety of pulsed field ablation in more than 17,000 patients with atrial fibrillation in the MANIFEST-17K study

Left atrial posterior wall isolation using pulsed-field ablation: procedural characteristics, safety, and mid-term outcomes

Pulsed field ablation using additional mapping and substrate modification to treat atrial fibrillation - one year outcome comparison

Efficacy and safety of novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) technique for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

First-in-human clinical series of a novel conformable large-lattice pulsed field ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation

Long-term patient clinical benefits and healthcare utilization after pulsed field ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: sub-analyses from the multicenter inspIRE trial

Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation