Abstract:Every day, we experience the effects of the global warming: extreme weather events, major forest fires, storms, global warming, etc.The scientific community acknowledges that this crisis is a consequence of human activities where Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) are an increasingly important contributor.Computer scientists need tools for measuring the footprint of the code they produce and for optimizing it. Running Average Power Limit (RAPL) is a low-level interface designed by Intel that provides a measure of the energy consumption of a CPU (and more) without the need for additional hardware. Since 2017, it is available on most computing devices, including non-Intel devices such as AMD processors.More and more people are using RAPL for energy measurement, mostly like a black box without deep knowledge of its behavior.Unfortunately, this causes mistakes when implementing measurement <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://tools.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> this paper, we propose to come back to the basic mechanisms that allow to use RAPL measurements and present a critical analysis of their operations. In addition to long-established mechanisms, we explore the suitability of the recent eBPF technology (formerly and abbreviation for extended Berkeley Packet Filter) for working with RAPL.For each mechanism, we release an implementation in Rust that avoids the pitfalls we detected in existing tools, improving correctness, timing accuracy and performance. These new implementations have desirable properties for monitoring and profiling parallel applications.We also provide an experimental study with multiple benchmarks and processor models (Intel and AMD) in order to evaluate the efficiency of the various mechanisms and their impact on parallel software.These experiments show that no mechanism provides a significant performance advantage over the others. However, they differ significantly in terms of ease-of-use and resiliency.We believe that this work will help the community to develop correct, resilient and lightweight measurement tools.

Complete System Power Estimation Using Processor Performance Events

Power Estimation for an Application on the Xscale Platform Using PMU Events

Power Reduction Through Measurement and Modeling of Users and CPUs: Summary

Power Profiling for Low Power Optimization Using New Computing Model

Data-Driven Power Modeling and Monitoring via Hardware Performance Counters Tracking

A Silicon-Validated Methodology for Power Delivery Modeling and Simulation

System-Level Power Estimation with On-Chip Bus Performance Monitoring Units in PKU-DSPII SoC

Power measurement techniques on standard compute nodes: A quantitative comparison

Towards Energy-Proportional Computing Using Subsystem-Level Power Management

Estimation and Analysis of Embedded Operating System Energy Consumption

System-on-Chip Power Consumption Refinement and Analysis

Data-driven Software-based Power Estimation for Embedded Devices

Power Measurement Methods for Energy Efficient Applications

Calibrating DRAMPower Model: A Runtime Perspective from Real-System HPC Measurements

Evaluating the Energy Measurements of the IBM POWER9 On-Chip Controller

Evaluating Neural Network Methods for PMC-based CPU Power Prediction

Modeling Power Consumption of Applications in Wireless Communication Devices Using OS Level Profiles

JetsonLEAP: a Framework to Measure Power on a Heterogeneous System-on-a-Chip Device

Dissecting the software-based measurement of CPU energy consumption: a comparative analysis

Novel Power and Completion Time Models for Virtualized Environments