Abstract:Aims and objectives: To explore patients', families' and health professionals' experiences of a long-stay patient in an intensive care unit. Background: The fast-paced technologically driven intensive care unit environment, designed for a short patient stay, supports the provision of complex physiologically focused care for those with life-threatening illnesses. Long-stay patients with pronounced fundamental care needs fall outside predicted patient pathways, and nurses can find caring for these patients challenging. Design and methods: A longitudinal, qualitative, multicase study of six cases from four New Zealand units. Case participants were patients, family members, nurses and other health professionals. Data collection methods included observation, conversations, interviews and document review. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, vignette development and trajectory mapping. Results: Challenges and successes of providing fundamental care for long-stay ICU patients are attributed to two interlinked factors. First, the biomedical model influences ICU nursing practices, resulting in prioritising tasks and technology for patient survival while simultaneously devaluing relational and comfort work. Fundamental psychosocial needs such as family presence, comfort, relationships and communication may be unmet. Second, the unit environment and culture have a significant impact on long-stay patients' ICU experiences and form physical and psychological barriers to families being present and involved. Some nurses negotiated these challenges to provide fundamental, patient- and family-centred care by adopting an approach of knowing the patient and these nurses reported satisfaction when seeing patients' positive responses. Conclusion: The care environment and culture provide challenges to the provision of patient- and family-centred care for long-stay patients; however, when nurses prioritise knowing their patient these challenges can be overcome and patient and family distress reduced with the potential to improve patient outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice: Recognition that patients have fundamental care needs irrespective of the setting where they receive care. Intensive care environments and cultures create challenges for nurses when there is such a heavy burden of physiological needs to be met and technological tasks to be undertaken, with a focus on acuity; however, improving provision fundamental care can result in positive patient outcomes.

Critical Care in the Austere Environment

Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)

Caring for the Critically Ill Patients: a Multidisciplinary Approach

Regional Anesthesia in the Austere Environment: Lessons Learned from Current Out-of-Hospital Practice

Divide and Save: A Critical Care Air Transport Team Case With Prolonged Field Care

Care of the critically ill begins in the emergency medicine setting

Systematized and efficient: organization of critical care in the future

Critical Illness Outside the Intensive Care Unit: Research Challenges in Emergency and Prehospital Settings

Creation of an Emergency Care Capacity Assessment Tool for Facilities in Austere Environments

Facing a serious problem: how to treat specific critical population without recommendations from current clinical practice guidelines

Recent advances in multidisciplinary critical care

Global critical care: a call to action

A health systems approach to critical care delivery in low-resource settings: a narrative review

Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission

The critical care air transport program

The impact of a prolonged stay in the ICU on patients' fundamental care needs

Tele-Critical Care Support Outside the Intensive Care Unit

Organization and Management of Critical Care Medicine

Operational Critical Care. Intensive Care and Trauma

Challenges to well‐being in critical care

The Relationship Between Critical Care Work Environment and Professional Quality of Life.