Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

Water Balance Modeling as a Tool for Assessing the Inventory Flows of Urban Water Systems and Water Consumption in Buildings

Quantifying Changes in Water Use and Groundwater Availability in a Megacity Using Novel Integrated Systems Modeling

Proposition of a hydro-economic model applied to the water conflict in the Alto São Marcos to optimize water allocation

Integration of a Network-Based and an Economy-Wide Water Model to Support Decision Making on Water Resources Planning and Management in Northeastern Brazil

Water Flux Characterization Through Hydraulic Head and Temperature Data Assimilation: Numerical Modeling and Sandbox Experiments

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

Stochastic model applied to water demand management in Brazil

Water Replenishment for Ecological Flow with an Improved Water Resources Allocation Model

Constructing the Model of Water Value Balance and Simulation Platform of Urban Water System in Harbin, China

Simulation of Intermittent Water Distribution Networks by EPA-SWMM: Comparing Model Results and Field Experiments

Water accounting for stressed river basins based on water resources management models

BIM-IoT-FM integration: strategy for implementation of sustainable water management in buildings

Water consumption assessment and classification in industrial buildings - The case study of Continental Advanced Antenna, Vila Real, Portugal

Virtual Water Accounting for Building: Case Study for E-town, Beijing

Intraurban spatial configuration, hydrologic similarity areas and their roles in urban drainage dynamics

The Water Balance Representation in Urban‐PLUMBER Land Surface Models

Water Replenishment for Ecological Flow with E-WAS Framework: a Case Study of the Longgang River Basin, Shenzhen, China

A New Approach to Modeling Water Balance in Nile River Basin, Africa

Global network of embodied water flow by systems input-output simulation

Modelling water quantity and quality for integrated water cycle management with the Water Systems Integrated Modelling framework (WSIMOD) software