0305 Can We Rely on Wearable Sleep-Tracker Devices for Fatigue Management?

Jaques Reifman,Nikolei Priezjev,Francisco Vital-Lopez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0305

IF: 6.313

2024-04-20

SLEEP

Abstract:Abstract Introduction The importance of sleep in daily life and advancements in our ability to measure bio-signals have led to an unprecedented growth in the use of commercial wearable sleep-tracker devices. However, sleep parameters estimated from these tracker devices often differ from the gold-standard polysomnography (PSG). It is unclear to what extent we can tolerate these errors within the context of a particular clinical or operational application. Here, we sought to develop a method to quantitatively determine whether a sleep tracker yields acceptable sleep-parameter estimates for assessing alertness impairment. Methods Using literature data, we characterized sleep-measurement errors of 18 unique sleep-tracker devices with respect to PSG. Then, using predictions based on the well-validated Unified Model of Performance, we compared the temporal variation of alertness for simulations with and without added PSG-device sleep-measurement errors, for nominal schedules of 5, 8, or 9 hours of sleep/night, or an irregular sleep schedule each night, for 30 consecutive days. Finally, we deemed a device error acceptable when the predicted differences were smaller than the within-subject variability of 30 ms. Results On average, the 18 sleep-tracker devices overestimated sleep duration by 19 (standard deviation = 44) minutes. Using these errors for 30 consecutive days, we found that, regardless of sleep schedule, in nearly 80% of the time the resulting predicted alertness differences were smaller than 30 ms, suggesting that most devices yield acceptable sleep-measurement errors. We also established the capability to estimate the extent to which a specific sleep-tracker device meets this acceptance criterion. Conclusion We provide a method to quantitatively determine whether a sleep-tracker device produces sleep measurements that are operationally acceptable for fatigue management. Support (if any) This work was sponsored by the Military Operational Medicine Program Area Directorate of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRDC), Fort Detrick, MD. The Henry M. Jackson Foundation was supported by the USAMRDC under Contract No. W81XWH20C0031.

neurosciences,clinical neurology