Pathophysiologic implications of elevated prevalence of hereditary alpha-tryptasemia in all mastocytosis subtypes
Laura Polivka,Marine Madrange,Cristina Bulai-Livideanu,Stéphane Barete,Thomas Ballul,Antoine Neuraz,Celine Greco,Julie Agopian,Fabienne Brenet,Patrice Dubreuil,Charles Burdet,Richard Lemal,Olivier Tournilhac,Louis Terriou,David Launay,Laurence Bouillet,Clément Gourguechon,Ghandi Damaj,Laurent Frenzel,Cécile Meni,Hassiba Bouktit,Anne Florence Collange,Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste,Marie Gousseff,Edwige Le Mouel,Mohamed Hamidou,Antoine Neel,Dana Ranta,Roland Jaussaud,Philippe Guilpain,Danielle Canioni,Thierry Jo Molina,Julie Bruneau,Ludovic Lhermitte,Nicolas Garcelon,Rose-Marie Javier,Fabien Pelletier,Florence Castelain,Frederique Retornaz,Quentin Cabrera,Patricia Zunic,Marie Pierre Gourin,Ewa Wierzbicka-Hainaut,Jean François Viallard,Christian Lavigne,Cyrille Hoarau,Isabelle Durieu,Maël Heiblig,Sophie Dimicoli-Salazar,Jose Miguel Torregrosa-Diaz,Angèle Soria,Michel Arock,Olivier Lortholary,Christine Bodemer,Olivier Hermine,Julien Rossignol,CEREMAST network
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.015
Abstract:Background: Mastocytosis and monoclonal mast cell (MC) activation syndrome (MMAS) are heterogeneous conditions characterized by the accumulation of atypical MCs. Despite the recurrent involvement of KIT mutations, the pathophysiologic origin of mastocytosis and MMAS is unclear. Although hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT, related to TPSAB1 gene duplication) is abnormally frequent in these diseases, it is not known whether the association is coincidental or causal. Objective: We evaluated the prevalence of HαT in all mastocytosis subtypes and MMAS and assessed the pathophysiologic association with HαT. Methods: Clinical data, laboratory data, KIT mutations, TPSAB1 duplication (assessed by droplet digital PCR), and HαT prevalence were retrospectively recorded for all patients with mastocytosis and MMAS registered in the French national referral center database and compared to a control cohort. To increase the power of our analysis for advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM), we pooled our cohort with literature cases. Results: We included 583 patients (27 with MMAS and 556 with mastocytosis). The prevalence of HαT in mastocytosis was 12.6%, significantly higher than in the general population (5.7%, P = .002) and lower than in MMAS (33.3%, P = .02). HαT+ patients were more likely to have anaphylactic reactions and less likely to have cutaneous lesions than HαT- patients (43.0% vs 24.4%, P = .006; 57.7% vs 75.6%, respectively, P = .006). In the pooled analysis, the prevalence of HαT was higher in advSM (11.5%) than in control cohorts (5.2%, P = .01). Conclusion: Here we confirm the increase incidence of anaphylaxis in HαT+ mastocytosis patients. The increased prevalence of HαT in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis (including advSM) is suggestive of pathophysiologic involvement.