Interactions between eosinophils and IL-5Rα-positive mast cells in nonadvanced systemic mastocytosis
Guillaume Lefèvre,Jean-Baptiste Gibier,Antonino Bongiovanni,Ludovic Lhermitte,Julien Rossignol,Emilie Anglo,Arnaud Dendooven,Romain Dubois,Louis Terriou,David Launay,Stéphane Barete,Stéphane Esnault,Laurent Frenzel,Clément Gourguechon,Thomas Ballul,Frédéric Dezoteux,Delphine Staumont-Salle,Marie-Christine Copin,Rachel Rignault-Bricard,Thiago Trovati Maciel,Gandhi Damaj,Meryem Tardivel,Marie Crinquette-Verhasselt,Patrice Dubreuil,Leila Maouche-Chrétien,Julie Bruneau,Olivier Lortholary,Nicolas Duployez,Hélène Behal,Thierry Jo Molina,Olivier Hermine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.025
Abstract:Background: Bidirectional interactions between eosinophils and mast cells (MCs) have been reported in various allergic diseases. Bone marrow (BM) eosinophilia, and to a lesser extent blood eosinophilia, is common in systemic mastocytosis (SM), but its significance remains unknown. Objective: We described blood and BM eosinophil characteristics in SM. Methods: A large collection of BM biopsy samples was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and whole-slide imaging. Eosinophil and extracellular granules were detected by eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) staining and MCs by KIT staining. Complementary analyses were conducted using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Results: Eosinophil infiltrates and large areas of eosinophil degranulation were observed within or around BM MC infiltrates in SM. EPX staining surface, highlighting intact eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation, was higher in nonadvanced SM (n = 37 BM biopsy samples) compared with both controls (n = 8, P = .0003) and advanced SM (n = 24, P = .014). In nonadvanced SM, positive correlations were observed between serum tryptase levels and percentages of eosinophil counts in BM aspirations (Spearman r coefficient r = 0.38, P = .038), eosinophils count in BM biopsy samples (r = 0.45, P = .007), EPX staining (r = 0.37, P = .035), and eosinophil degranulation (r = 0.39, P = .023). Eosinophil counts in BM biopsy samples also correlated with MC counts (r = 0.47, P = .006) and KIT staining surface (r = 0.49, P = .003). BM MCs expressed IL-5 receptor and other usual eosinophil cytokine/chemokine receptors, and blood eosinophils displayed several increased surface markers compared with controls, suggesting an activated state. Conclusion: Our data suggest possible cross talk between MCs and eosinophils, supporting MC tryptase release and MC activation-related symptoms. This suggests a rationale for targeting eosinophils in nonadvanced SM not fully controlled by other therapies.