Abstract:Significant differences in loan terms between demographically distinct groups of borrowers in the United States are often interpreted as evidence of systematic ethnic, racial or gender discrimination by lenders. The appearance and interpretation of such discrimination has long been a controversial issue in public policy and has significant implications for both the economic efficiency and equity of credit markets. Arising from concern for borrowers disadvantaged by such discrimination, the design and implementation of regulations preventing the disparate treatment of demographically distinct groups by lenders are generally considered to have enhanced the equality of access to credit. Unfortunately, existing research has not examined whether this gain in social equity comes at a cost in efficiency borne by all market participants. The reliance on adverse selection or moral hazard in current models of limited lending and credit rationing poses difficulties in empirical testing for the presence and magnitude of such costs. This paper offers a novel theoretical framework in which lending discrimination can endogenously arise in the presence of value-maximizing lenders competing in an economy with complete markets, common knowledge and arbitrage-free pricing. By avoiding the reliance of current models on the exogenous presence of adverse selection or moral hazard, this framework allows potential efficiency costs to beexamined in a market environment without an ex ante assumption of informational market failure. Owing to the presence of common knowledge among participants, we first show how equilibrium loan terms to borrowers in different demographic classes can diverge in such an efficient environment. We then apply the properties exhibited in market equilibria to measure the potential costs of misallocating credit risk owing to the type of regulations observed in actual credit markets.

Tax Deductibility, Market Frictions, and Price Discrimination: Evidence from the Mortgage Market.

Interest Deduction Policy of American Home Mortgage and Experience Reference

Per-Customer Quantity Limit and Price Discrimination: Evidence from the U.S. Residential Mortgage Market

The Interest Rate Elasticity of Mortgage Demand: Evidence from Bunching at the Conforming Loan Limit

Mortgage interest deductions? Not a bad idea after all

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortgage Lending: New Evidence from Expanded HMDA Data

Mortgage Refinancing, Consumer Spending, and Competition: Evidence from the Home Affordable Refinance Program

Evidence of Government Subsidy on Mortgage Rate and Default: Revisited

Implications of US Tax Policy for House Prices, Rents, and Homeownership

Mortgage Design, Repayment Schedules, and Household Borrowing

Non-Salient Fees in the Mortgage Market

Increasing Access, Equitability, and Rigor in the Assessment of Neighborhood Mortgage Discrimination

Credit Risk, Regulatory Costs and Lending Discrimination in Efficient Residential Mortgage Markets

Information Salience and Mispricing in Housing

The real effects of borrower-based macroprudential policy: Evidence from administrative household-level data

Race, redlining, and residential mortgage loan performance

Macroeconomic implications of mortgage loan requirements: an agent-based approach

The marginal cost of mortality risk reduction: Evidence from housing markets

On the economic impacts of mortgage credit expansion policies: Evidence from help to buy

Mortgage Design in an Equilibrium Model of the Housing Market

A mortgage valuation model: a tale of two equations