The effect of short‐term remote ischemic preconditioning on endothelial function of patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized pilot study

Xieguanxuan Xu,Yu Zhang,Yuhao Chen,Chen Yang,Xinru Guo,Qiuyue Zhang,Yisha Li,Jie Wu,Xueying Cao,XiangMei Chen,Guangyan Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.14282
2024-03-06
Nephrology
Abstract:Summary at a glance In this randomized pilot trial, we evaluated the effect of short‐term remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) on endothelial function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The novel findings showed that the 7‐day treatment of rIPC could safely improve vascular endothelial function in patients with CKD. Moreover, the potential biomarkers associated with vascular function showed no significant improvement after the rIPC intervention. Aim Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are more susceptible to endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease (CV). Remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) has been proven efficient in improving endothelial function and lowering the risk of CV. However, the safety and effect of rIPC on endothelial function in patients with CKD have not been effectively assessed. Methods 45 patients with CKD (average estimated glomerular filtration rate: 48.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) were randomly allocated to either 7‐day daily upper‐arm rIPC (4 × 5 min 200 mmHg, interspaced by 5‐min reperfusion) or control (4 × 5 min 60 mmHg, interspaced by 5‐min reperfusion). Vascular endothelial function was assessed by natural log–transformed reactive hyperemia index (LnRHI) before and after a 7‐day intervention. Arterial elasticity was assessed by augmentation index (AI). Results The results showed that LnRHI could be improved by rIPC treatment (Pre = 0.57 ± 0.04 vs. Post = 0.67 ± 0.04, p = .001) with no changes relative to control (Pre = 0.68 ± 0.06 vs. Post = 0.64 ± 0.05, p = .470). Compared with the control group, the improvement of LnRHI was greater after rIPC treatment (rIPC vs. Control: 0.10 ± 0.03 vs. −0.04 ± 0.06, between‐group mean difference, −0.15 [95% CI, −0.27 to −0.02], p = .027), while there was no significant difference in the change of AI@75 bpm (p = .312) between the two groups. Conclusion RIPC is safe and well tolerated in patients with CKD. This pilot study suggests that rIPC seems to have the potential therapeutic effect to improve endothelial function. Of note, further larger trials are still warranted to confirm the efficacy of rIPC in improving endothelial function in CKD patients.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?