Protection of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Against Acute Kidney Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jiachang Hu,Shaopeng Liu,Ping Jia,Xialian Xu,Nana Song,Ting Zhang,Rongyi Chen,Xiaoqiang Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1272-y
IF: 15.1
2016-01-01
Critical Care
Abstract:Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a promising approach to preventing acute kidney injury (AKI), but its efficacy is controversial.Methods: A systematic review of 30 randomized controlled trials was conducted to investigate the effects of RIPC on the incidence and outcomes of AKI. Random effects model meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to generate summary estimates and explore sources of heterogeneity. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI and hospital mortality.Results: The total pooled incidence of AKI in the RIPC group was 11.5 %, significantly less than the 23.3 % incidence in the control group (P =0.009). Subgroup analyses indicated that RIPC significantly reduced the incidence of AKI in the contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI) subgroup from 13.5 % to 6.5 % (P=0.000), but not in the ischemia/reperfusion-induced AKI (IR-AKI) subgroup (from 29.5 % to 24.7 %, P=0.173). Random effects meta-regression indicated that RIPC tended to strengthen its renoprotective effect (q=3.95, df=1, P=0.047) in these trials with a higher percentage of diabetes mellitus. RIPC had no significant effect on the incidence of stages 1-3 AKI or renal replacement therapy, change in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hospital or 30-day mortality, or length of hospital stay. But RIPC significantly increased the minimum eGFR in the IR-AKI subgroup (P=0.006) compared with the control group. In addition, the length of ICU stay in the RIPC group was significantly shorter than in the control group (2.6 vs 2.0 days, P=0.003).Conclusions: We found strong evidence to support the application of RIPC to prevent CI-AKI, but not IR-AKI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?