Art Creation and Human Reproduction

Barbara Tryka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/RKULT21121-8
2021-03-30
Abstract:The following paper is an analysis of performance IMMACULATE by Casey Jenkins. The performance presents an act of artist’s self-insemination with semen from a donor. IMMACULATE prompts the author to ask question if it is morally acceptable to perform auto-fertilization as an art itself. The article is divided into four sections. First, describe the idea and the context of IMMACULATE. In the second section, the author consider if the artist’s actions are pretended and when they may be authentic. The third section discusses the artist’s action in the context of intentional blurring of boundaries between real life and world of art and the artist and the audience suspension between ethical and aesthetic norms. In the fourth part the author discuss critically objections against IMMACULATE that have ethical significance. Moreover, exemplifies problems with interpretation performance art in the context of traditional aesthetic categories like “artwork,” as well as problems with identification of an artwork and recognition of art boundaries in spatialdurational, institutional and moral dimension. The article is based on the assumption that art is not autonomous. Thus, the author shows appreciation to the the moral dimension of an artist’s freedom and responsibility for taken actions supporting the view that the value of art is not dominant over the human.
Art,Sociology,Philosophy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?