The perceptual responses of individuals with multiple sclerosis to blood flow restriction versus traditional resistance exercise
Eduardo D S Freitas,Ryan M Miller,Aaron D Heishman,Rodrigo R Aniceto,Rebecca Larson,Hugo M Pereira,Debra Bemben,Michael G Bemben,Eduardo D. S. Freitas,Ryan M. Miller,Aaron D. Heishman,Rodrigo R. Aniceto,Hugo M. Pereira,Michael G. Bemben
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113219
2021-02-01
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (LLBFR-RE) has been shown capable of improving neuromuscular parameters in clinical populations, however, its tolerability and effects on multiple sclerosis (MS) patients remains unknown.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>To investigate the perceptual responses of MS patients to LLBFR-RE versus traditional high-load resistance exercise (HL-RE).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Four men and eleven women diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS randomly completed the following experimental trials: LLBFR-RE– four sets of 30-15-15-15 repetitions, at 20% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM) of leg-press (LP) and knee-extension (KE), with 50% of BFR, and a 1-min rest interval between sets; 2) HL-RE– four sets of 8-10 repetitions, at 70% 1-RM of LP and KE, with the same rest intervals. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured after each set, ratings of discomfort (RD) were measured before and after sets, and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) were measured at 5, 30, 60-min, and 24-h post-exercise.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>HL-RE elicited significantly (p<0.05) greater RPE compared to LLBFR-RE during all sets. Additionally, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences between LLBFR-RE and HL-RE for the RD immediately after all sets, although RD measured before sets were significantly (p<0.05) greater for LLBFR-RE. Finally, both protocols resulted in similar DOMS, however, it was significantly (p<0.05) elevated 24-h post-exercise compared to 1-h after for HL-RE but not for LLBFR-RE.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Altogether, these data demonstrate that LLBFR-RE is well tolerated by MS patients, requires less muscular exertion than HL-RE, and does not cause exaggerated discomfort during exercise or elevated DOMS up to 24 hours post-exercise.</p>
behavioral sciences,psychology, biological