Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Peter Ladlow,Russell J. Coppack,Shreshth Dharm-Datta,Dean Conway,Edward Sellon,Stephen D. Patterson,Alexander N. Bennett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01269
IF: 4
2018-09-10
Frontiers in Physiology
Abstract:<b>Background:</b> There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. <b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. <b>Study design:</b> A single-blind randomized controlled study. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT). <b>Results:</b> A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group (<i>p</i> = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. <b>Conclusion:</b> Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.
physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?