Techno-optimism needs a reality check

Mark Buchanan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02390-7

IF: 19.684

2024-02-15

Nature Physics

Abstract:Many scientists, I think, take a somewhat sceptical view of radical techno-optimism — the unshakeable faith, expressed by many economists and tech industry leaders, that technology will solve all of humanity's looming issues. Artificial intelligence (AI) will revolutionize education and medicine, and perhaps even resolve the problem of aging, eliminating the necessity of death. For techno-optimists, new sources of energy, including nuclear fusion, will defuse the climate crisis and set humanity free to pursue a future of boundless abundance and limitless creativity as we come to live among the stars. An unintentional parody of this view was recently published by Marc Andreessen, founding partner of the Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. In The Techno-optimist Manifesto (see https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/), Andreessen makes the obvious point that our human capacity to learn, create and share technology has played a decisive role in our historical success, and will also be crucial in the future. But he takes the argument well into the absurd, insisting, for example, that any concerns about AI risks and calls for caution in development are irresponsible: "We believe any deceleration of AI will cost lives. Deaths that were preventable by the AI that was prevented from existing is a form of murder."

physics, multidisciplinary