Abstract:This two‐part study included consensus‐building surveys and a cross‐sectional survey among participants with self‐reported dermatological conditions to assess instrument psychometric properties of the revised Internalized Skin Bias Questionnaire (ISBQ‐R). Overall, 33 experts participated including 22 (66.7%) dermatologists or dermatology researchers and 11 (33.3%) patients. The revised survey was completed by 214 participants with various dermatological conditions. Adding and modifying new items (9 in total) resulted in an instrument with stronger internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and a stronger correlation with other existing stigma measures (ρ = 0.72) as well as health‐related quality of life (ρ = −0.68), anxious (ρ = 0.51) and depressive (0.53) symptoms. Additionally, the study further expanded upon previous research by exploring a two‐factor structure, suggesting that the ISBQ‐R could be used as a single or dual factor instrument depending on investigator goals. Background The psychological impacts of skin disease are well documented, with patients reporting increased anxiety, depression and poorer quality of life. More recent studies suggest that adverse psychopathology is associated with re‐direction of skin‐disease‐related social stigma towards oneself or internalized skin bias (ISB). Objectives To refine the Internalized Skin Bias Questionnaire (ISBQ) to reflect the construct of ISB with additional skin‐specific biases as well as to evaluate its psychometric properties in a diverse sample of individuals with various skin conditions. Methods Two‐part observational design including consensus‐building surveys among a dermatology expert group and a cross‐sectional survey among participants with self‐reported dermatological conditions to assess instrument psychometric properties. Eligible participants completed an online survey comprised of the revised ISBQ (ISBQ‐R), the Questionnaire on Experiences with Skin Diseases‐Short Form (QES‐SF), the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Beck Depression Inventory‐II (BDI‐II) and the Burns Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Results Overall, 33 experts participated including 22 (66.7%) dermatologists or dermatology researchers and 11 (33.3%) patients. Except for three items in the first round, all items received high agreement for inclusion from the expert group. The revised survey was completed by 214 participants who identified mostly as female (n = 185; 86.9%), White (n = 182; 85.5%) and non‐Hispanic/Latino (n = 200; 93.4%). Adding and modifying new items resulted in an instrument with stronger internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and a stronger correlation with other existing stigma measures (QES‐SF; ρ = 0.72). Conclusions The ISBQ‐R is a modified instrument with stronger internal consistency and a stronger correlation with other existing stigma measures. Additionally, the study further expanded upon previous research by exploring a two‐factor structure, suggesting that the ISBQ‐R could be used as a single‐ or a dual‐factor instrument depending on investigator goals.

Internal consistency reliability of the Revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis

The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire

The factor structure of the revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R) in end-stage renal disease patients

The factor structure of the Turkish version of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease

[Contribution to the Italian validation of the IPQ-R]

The Applicability,Reliability and Validity of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire for Healthy Women (IPQ-RH)

Psychometric properties of the revised internalized skin bias questionnaire

The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) Reconsidered: Validation and Reference Values From Different Clinical and Healthy Adult Samples

A Systematic Review of the Literature Exploring Illness Perceptions in Mental Health Utilising the Self-Regulation Model

The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure

The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire: Evaluating Aspects of Self-Reported Interoception in Patients With Persistent Somatic Symptoms, Stress-Related Syndromes, and Healthy Controls

Patient Health Questionnaire-9: A clinimetric analysis

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Perceptions of Parental Illness Questionnaire for Cancer

Illness cognitions and family adjustment: psychometric properties of the Illness Cognition Questionnaire for parents of a child with cancer

Validation of the IBD-Control Questionnaire across different sociodemographic and clinical subgroups: secondary analysis of a nationwide electronic survey

The Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences: An Examination of the Validity and Reliability

Validation of the Relationships Questionnaire (RQ) against the Experience of Close Relationship-Revised Questionnaire in a Clinical Psychiatric Sample

A Chinese version of the Stroke Illness Perception Questionnaire‐Revised: Reliability and validity assessment in stroke patients

Qualitative and Psychometric Evaluation of 29-Item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® to Assess General Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease