Abstract:Causal reasoning is a fundamental cognitive ability that enables individuals to learn about the complex interactions in the world around them. However, the mechanisms that underpin causal reasoning are not well understood. For example, it remains unresolved whether children's causal inferences are best explained by Bayesian inference or associative learning. The two experiments and computational models reported here were designed to examine whether 5- and 6-year-olds will retrospectively reevaluate objects-that is, adjust their beliefs about the causal status of some objects presented at an earlier point in time based on the observed causal status of other objects presented at a later point in time-when asked to reason about 3 and 4 objects and under varying degrees of information processing demands. Additionally, the experiments and models were designed to determine whether children's retrospective reevaluations were best explained by associative learning, Bayesian inference, or some combination of both. The results indicated that participants retrospectively reevaluated causal inferences under minimal information-processing demands (Experiment 1) but failed to do so under greater information processing demands (Experiment 2) and that their performance was better captured by an associative learning mechanism, with less support for descriptions that rely on Bayesian inference. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Five- and 6-year-old children engage in retrospective reevaluation under minimal information-processing demands (Experiment 1). Five- and 6-year-old children do not engage in retrospective reevaluation under more extensive information-processing demands (Experiment 2). Across both experiments, children's retrospective reevaluations were better explained by a simple associative learning model, with only minimal support for a simple Bayesian model. These data contribute to our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms by which children make causal judgements.

Acceptance of lack of closure: is it an index of advanced reasoning?

Children's On-Line Processing of Epistemic Modals.

Children's Knowledge of Free Choice Inferences

Development of Logical Reasoning in the Context of Parental Style and Test Anxiety.

The development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy

Children’s use of reasoning by exclusion to infer objects’ identities in working memory

Toddlers' understanding and use of verbal negation in inferential reasoning search tasks

Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood

The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children

The scope and role of deduction in infant cognition

From outcome to process: A developmental shift in judgments of good reasoning

Longitudinal changes in the neural oscillatory dynamics underlying abstract reasoning in children and adolescents

When Do Program-of-Thought Works for Reasoning?

Inhibition and young children’s performance on the Tower of London task

Children's emerging ability to balance internal and external cognitive resources

Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals

The neural development of conditional reasoning in children: Different mechanisms for assessing the logical validity and likelihood of conclusions

Don't throw the associative baby out with the Bayesian bathwater: Children are more associative when reasoning retrospectively under information processing demands

The complex associations between scientific reasoning and advanced theory of mind.

Developmental reconstruction of cognitive ability: Interactions between executive, cognizance, and reasoning processes in childhood

Chronometric evidence for memory retrieval in causal conditional reasoning: the case of the association strength effect