Abstract:e18832 Background: Human health is intrinsically linked to the environment’s health; therefore, it is essential for the surgical oncology community, healthcare providers (HCPs) and hospital leadership alike, to incorporate environmentally sustainable practices, while continuing to provide high quality care. Hospital operating rooms (ORs) have a serious environmental impact due to a high rate of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, medical waste generation, and energy consumption. An evidence-based understanding of the environmental impact of ORs, as well as sustainability initiatives undertaken to decrease this impact, are crucial for generating and implementing appropriate policies and guidelines. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to determine the perceptions and beliefs of HCPs and decision-makers related to environmental sustainability in OR settings globally. Methods: An SLR was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Embase and PubMed searches were conducted to identify relevant studies published between January 2011 and November 2022. Results: The analysis incorporated thirty-four studies focused on the perceptions and beliefs of OR HCPs and decision-makers on sustainability initiatives. The majority of HCPs across all studies indicated a willingness to engage in these sustainability initiatives such as recycling, while noting frequent barriers that prevent participation, such as lack of awareness and education, hospital funding, facilities to carry out recycling processes, and guidance at the hospital level. One study noted that robotic and laparoscopic procedures, when compared to open procedures, generate greater quantities of waste and GHG emissions. In a survey of 400 anesthesiologists, the lack of support from the hospital and inadequate education were identified as the main barriers to OR recycling by more than 60% of respondents. Common sustainability initiatives suggested by HCPs included creating a sustainability steering committee, reducing overall OR waste via recycling and waste segregation, education and training dedicated to environmental sustainability and enforcement of rules and mandates for sustainability initiatives. Conclusions: HCPs are aware of potential opportunities to make ORs more environmentally sustainable and HCPs are willing, but not necessarily able, to participate in these efforts. Existing literature shows that HCPs have suggestions for how to minimize the environmental impact of the OR. Oncologists interested in adopting more sustainable practices can use this research as a guide for key themes and barriers to acknowledge when designing and implementing their own initiatives. More research is needed on the implementation and impact of sustainability initiatives on the environment.

Patient Preferences for Disposable and Reusable Vaginal Specula and Their Willingness to Compromise in the Era of Climate Change: A Cross-Sectional Study

A comparative carbon footprint analysis of disposable and reusable vaginal specula

Improving sustainability in sexual health: A pilot project reintroducing reusable stainless steel vaginal specula at a sexual health clinic

Patients perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice

Life cycle assessment of stainless-steel reusable speculums versus disposable acrylic speculums in a university clinic setting: a case study

The United European Gastroenterology green paper-climate change and gastroenterology

Perspectives and awareness of endoscopy healthcare professionals on sustainable practices in gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of the LEAFGREEN survey

How to choose between single‐use and reusable medical materials for sustainable nursing: Methodological lessons learned from a national study

The economic impact of unused suture at a community hospital

Willingness to Pay and Preferences Among Patients Undergoing Cystoscopies: Results from a Large Survey-Based Study in Spain

Environmental sustainability in gynecologic oncology

Measuring and improving the cradle-to-grave environmental performance of urological procedures

The Greener Choice: Vaginal Hysterectomy's Environmental Edge Over Laparoscopic Techniques

Sustainability in Respiratory Therapy: Revisiting Reusables

Bacterial contamination and greenhouse gas emissions: A randomised study of reuse versus single-use of infusion-set components for intravenous anaesthesia

Health care provider and hospital decision-maker perceptions and beliefs on global environmental sustainability in the operating room.

Uniting the global gastroenterology community to meet the challenge of climate change and non-recyclable waste

Green endoscopy, one step toward a sustainable future: Literature review

Sustainability of Single-Use Endoscopes

Reusable Surgical Headwear has a Reduced Carbon Footprint and Matches Disposables Regarding Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Making minimally invasive procedures more sustainable: A systematic review comparing the environmental footprint of single‐use versus multi‐use instruments