Patients perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice

Eva Visser,Evelyn Brakema,Irene Slootweg,Hedwig Vos,Marieke Adriaanse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.18.24310602
2024-10-18
Abstract:Background: Healthcare contributes substantially to climate change. GPs want to implement sustainable healthcare, but are hesitant; worried that this may jeopardise their patient-physician relationship. However, whether this concern is valid is yet to be assessed. Aim: To explore patients perspectives on sustainable healthcare in general practice. Design and setting: In 2022 and 2023 we performed an online study, among Dutch GP patients, using experimental vignettes and a questionnaire. Method: The vignettes described GP appointments for three health complaints with randomly allocated treatment advice, varying in sustainability and explanation, but with comparable health outcomes. The questionnaire assessed patients perspectives on sustainable healthcare in general practice. We analysed the vignettes using mixed-design ANOVA and the questionnaire using descriptive statistics and correlations. Results: 801 participants completed the vignettes, and 397 the questionnaire. We found no difference on satisfaction with a doctors visit (Ps>.238) when comparing a sustainable and a non-sustainable treatment option. The effect of explicitly mentioning sustainability differed per health complaint (dyspnoea: no difference; knee pain: MD=.319, P=.002; erythema: MD=-.227, P=.003). In the questionnaire, participants reported positive expectations, and trust in the GP and treatment when delivering sustainable healthcare, but were more neutral about the GPs role. Conclusion: We found no indication that sustainable treatment advice leads to lower satisfaction with healthcare. The effect of explicitly mentioning sustainability was minimal and differed per health complaint. When directly asked, patients were mainly positive about sustainable healthcare. These results could encourage GPs to introduce sustainable treatment advice, without worrying about negatively influencing patient satisfaction.
Primary Care Research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?