Abstract:Abstract Context This narrative review article explores research integrity and the implications of scholarly work in medical education. The paper describes how the current landscape of medical education emphasizes research and scholarly activity for medical students, resident physicians, and faculty physician educators. There is a gap in the existing literature that fully explores research integrity, the challenges surrounding the significant pressure to perform scholarly activity, and the potential for ethical lapses by those involved in medical education. Objectives The objectives of this review article are to provide a background on authorship and publication safeguards, outline common types of research misconduct, describe the implications of publication in medical education, discuss the consequences of ethical breaches, and outline possible solutions to promote research integrity in academic medicine. Methods To complete this narrative review, the authors explored the current literature utilizing multiple databases beginning in June of 2021, and they completed the literature review in January of 2023. To capture the wide scope of the review, numerous searches were performed. A number of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were utilized to identify relevant articles. The MeSH terms included “scientific misconduct,” “research misconduct,” “authorship,” “plagiarism,” “biomedical research/ethics,” “faculty, medical,” “fellowships and scholarships,” and “internship and residency.” Additional references were accessed to include medical school and residency accreditation standards, residency match statistics, regulatory guidelines, and standard definitions. Results Within the realm of academic medicine, research misconduct and misrepresentation continue to occur without clear solutions. There is a wide range of severity in breaches of research integrity, ranging from minor infractions to fraud. Throughout the medical education system in the United States, there is pressure to publish research and scholarly work. Higher rates of publications are associated with a successful residency match for students and academic promotion for faculty physicians. For those who participate in research misconduct, there is a multitude of potential adverse consequences. Potential solutions to ensure research integrity exist but are not without barriers to implementation. Conclusions Pressure in the world of academic medicine to publish contributes to the potential for research misconduct and authorship misrepresentation. Lapses in research integrity can result in a wide range of potentially adverse consequences for the offender, their institution, the scientific community, and the public. If adopted, universal research integrity policies and procedures could make major strides in eliminating research misconduct in the realm of academic medicine.

Bibliometric review and mapping analysis of publication ethics research

Ethics and Integrity Challenges During COVID-19 in China

A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases

Publishing Research in China: History, Characteristics, and Challenges

Productivity Patterns, Collaboration and Scientific Careers of Authors with Retracted Publications in Clinical Medicine

A Survey of Ethical Issues in 10 Chinese Medical Journals

A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship

Ethical challenges related to biomedical data sharing in China: A systematic literature review

Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct

Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?

Enhancing Research Integrity and Publication Ethics: An Analysis of the Latest International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations

Questionable practices in data and code sharing policy in high-profile medical journal and research

Post‐publication research integrity concerns in randomized clinical trials: A scoping review of the literature

Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors

Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Media Ethics Research since the 21st Century: a CiteSpace-based Knowledge Mapping Analysis

Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE)

Research hotspots and prospects of ethics education of science and technology in China based on bibliometrics

A Systematic Literature Review of Ethical Challenges Related to Medical and Public Health Data Sharing in China

Ananalysis on the data publishing policies of international medical journals

Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010

Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe