Abstract:Abstract Context This narrative review article explores research integrity and the implications of scholarly work in medical education. The paper describes how the current landscape of medical education emphasizes research and scholarly activity for medical students, resident physicians, and faculty physician educators. There is a gap in the existing literature that fully explores research integrity, the challenges surrounding the significant pressure to perform scholarly activity, and the potential for ethical lapses by those involved in medical education. Objectives The objectives of this review article are to provide a background on authorship and publication safeguards, outline common types of research misconduct, describe the implications of publication in medical education, discuss the consequences of ethical breaches, and outline possible solutions to promote research integrity in academic medicine. Methods To complete this narrative review, the authors explored the current literature utilizing multiple databases beginning in June of 2021, and they completed the literature review in January of 2023. To capture the wide scope of the review, numerous searches were performed. A number of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were utilized to identify relevant articles. The MeSH terms included “scientific misconduct,” “research misconduct,” “authorship,” “plagiarism,” “biomedical research/ethics,” “faculty, medical,” “fellowships and scholarships,” and “internship and residency.” Additional references were accessed to include medical school and residency accreditation standards, residency match statistics, regulatory guidelines, and standard definitions. Results Within the realm of academic medicine, research misconduct and misrepresentation continue to occur without clear solutions. There is a wide range of severity in breaches of research integrity, ranging from minor infractions to fraud. Throughout the medical education system in the United States, there is pressure to publish research and scholarly work. Higher rates of publications are associated with a successful residency match for students and academic promotion for faculty physicians. For those who participate in research misconduct, there is a multitude of potential adverse consequences. Potential solutions to ensure research integrity exist but are not without barriers to implementation. Conclusions Pressure in the world of academic medicine to publish contributes to the potential for research misconduct and authorship misrepresentation. Lapses in research integrity can result in a wide range of potentially adverse consequences for the offender, their institution, the scientific community, and the public. If adopted, universal research integrity policies and procedures could make major strides in eliminating research misconduct in the realm of academic medicine.

Enhancing Research Integrity and Publication Ethics: An Analysis of the Latest International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations

Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct

Publishing Biomedical Research: a rapidly evolving ecosystem

Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology

Editors and Authors of Medical Journals Should Be Mindful of the New ICMJE Disclosure Form and Updated Policies

Recent Issues in Medical Journal Publishing and Editing Policies: Adoption of Artificial Intelligence, Preprints, Open Peer Review, Model Text Recycling Policies, Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 4th Version, and Country Names in Titles

Data sharing: A new editorial initiative of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers

A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences

Motivating and Maintaining Ethics, Equity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Expertise in Peer Review

Protecting and promoting editorial independence

Research integrity in Instructions for Authors in Japanese medical journals using ICMJE Recommendations: A descriptive literature study

Ethics approval: responsibilities of journal editors, authors and research ethics committees

Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Research Integrity definitions and challenges

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors

Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study

Integrity at stake: confronting “publish or perish” in the developing world and emerging economies

Improving Systems to Promote Research Integrity

The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing – strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics

Safeguarding Scientific Integrity: Examining Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review Process