Abstract:Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, Ahead of Print. In this paper, we make an attempt to increase our understanding of the urban scaling phenomenon. The aim is to investigate how superlinear scaling emerges if a network increases in size and how this scaling depends on the occurrence of elements that constitute the network. To this end, we consider a city as a complex network structure and simulate this structure by the network of all publications of a research intensive university. In this simulation, the publications take the role of the city inhabitants and the concepts (terms and keywords) in the publications represent all kinds of abilities and qualities of the inhabitants. We use in this experiment all author- and database-given terms of the scientific publications of Leiden University from 2022. We calculate the co-occurrence of terms, and on the basis of these connections, we create a network and let this network grow by successively adding publications from the total set of publications. In this way, we get a series of networks with different sizes and this simulates a series of cities with different number of inhabitants. This procedure is performed for different values of the term occurrence threshold. We then analyze how four important network parameters, namely, number of terms, number of clusters, number of links, and total link strength increase with increasing size of the network. Particularly the number of network links and the total network linkage strength are in our opinion the parameters that dominate the scaling phenomenon and can be considered as a simulation of the socioeconomic strength of a city, that is, its gross urban product. We find a significant power law dependence of these network parameters on network size and the power law exponents for the lowest occurrence threshold are within the range that is typical for urban scaling. In our approach, the number of clusters can be interpreted as a measure of complexity within the network. Since the occurrence threshold determines the diversity of terms, we may expect a special relation between the occurrence threshold and the number of clusters. This is indeed the case: whereas for the three other network parameters the scaling exponent increases with increasing occurrence threshold, the number of clusters is the only network parameter of which the scaling exponent decreases with increasing occurrence threshold. Finally, we discuss how our publication term network approach relates to scaling phenomena in cities.

Urban scaling theory: Answers to frequent questions

The hypothesis of urban scaling: formalization, implications and challenges

Urban Scaling Laws

Mathematical models to explain the origin of urban scaling laws: a synthetic review

Analyzing urban scaling laws in the United States over 115 years

Urban scaling in Europe

Explaining the Prevalence, Scaling and Variance of Urban Phenomena

Thermodynamic-based Ecological Scaling Theory in Urban Metabolic Framework: a Review

Paradoxical Interpretations of Urban Scaling Laws

Global city densities: re-examining urban scaling theory

Understanding the mesoscopic scaling patterns within cities

The pre-history of urban scaling

Universal Patterns in the Long-term Growth of Urban Infrastructure in U.S. Cities from 1900 to 2015

Paradoxical Urban Scaling Across Cities and Over Time

Tiebout, Coase and urban scaling

Simple spatial scaling rules behind complex cities

On Scaling Functionality in Urban Form

Scaling, Fractals and the Spatial Complexity of Cities

Simulating urban scaling with a term linkages network of a university

From global scaling to the dynamics of individual cities

Cross-sectional Urban Scaling Fails in Predicting Temporal Growth of Cities