Tiebout, Coase and urban scaling

Chris Webster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-024-01272-3

2024-04-28

The Annals of Regional Science

Abstract:A growing body of urban research takes a natural science perspective on systems of cities as self-organising human clusters. From a systems perspective, this work, particularly the growing number of city scaling studies, introduces a determinism to studies of city size, efficiency and performance that may not sit well with regional science and urban economic planning models. It finds that agglomeration economies seem to follow regular scale-free power laws that reflect competitive dynamics within an entire interacting human system of cities and that a city's performance is therefore statistically bounded by the whole system. Where does this leave empirical models of individual city performance and behavioural models of urban political economy that underpin them? The paper links two seminal economic models of the 20th century that were motivated to demonstrate the possibility of preference revelation for the 'unpriceables' that give cities their value. Tiebout's and Coase's models of social order both concern natural clustering principles, governed by voting with feet, voice and price. Voting with feet is a much more animalistic social ordering mechanism than voting with voice and the paper introduces the idea of scale-free Tieboutian models—natural science models of revealed preference for local public expenditure.

economics,environmental studies,regional & urban planning,geography

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to combine urban - scale research with the theories of two important economists in the 20th century, Charles Tiebout and Ronald Coase, in order to better understand individual and collective behaviors in urban systems. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects:

1. **The relationship between urban - scale research and the Tiebout model**:
- Urban - scale research has revealed the power - law relationships between urban performance and scale, and these relationships reflect the choice behaviors of individuals and enterprises in urban systems.
- Tiebout's model emphasizes revealing preferences for local public goods through "voting with one's feet". The paper explores the application of this behavior in urban - scale research and proposes the concept of the scale - free Tiebout model.

2. **The relationship between urban - scale research and the Coase model**:
- Coase's model focuses on the pricing of externalities, that is, how to solve pollution problems through negotiation.
- The paper explores the roles of "voting with one's feet" and "voting with one's voice" in urban systems, especially their applications in explaining urban population distribution and urban performance.

3. **The philosophical challenges of urban - scale research**:
- Natural scientists use natural science research methods (such as big data and statistical physics) to study urban processes, which may bypass behavioral social sciences.
- The paper discusses the challenges of this new urban science method to traditional urban behavior models and proposes how to apply Tiebout and Coase's theories to explain patterns in urban systems.

4. **Behavioral explanations and urban system laws**:
- The paper explores whether Tiebout and Coase's initial insights can provide deeper behavioral explanations for the empirical evidence of urban performance laws.
- Specifically, the paper explores how to use these theories to guide policies, thereby changing a city's position on the national performance curve or its position in the performance - expected distribution adjusted by population.

In conclusion, this paper aims to provide a new perspective for urban - scale research by combining Tiebout and Coase's theories, so as to better understand individual and collective behaviors in urban systems.