Abstract:During visual imagination, a perceptual representation is activated in the absence of sensory input. This is sometimes described as seeing with the mind's eye. A number of physiological studies indicate that the brain uses more or less the same neural resources for visual perception of sensory information and visual imagination. The intensity of visual imagination is typically assessed with questionnaires, while more objective measures are missing. Aim of the present study was, to test a new experimental paradigm that may allow to objectively quantify imagination. For this, we used priming and adaptation effects during observation of ambiguous figures. Our perception of an ambiguous stimulus is unstable and alternates spontaneously between two possible interpretations. If we first observe an unambiguous stimulus variant (the conditioning stimulus), the subsequently presented ambiguous stimulus can either be perceived in the same way as the test stimulus (priming effect) or in the opposite way (adaptation effect) as a function of the conditioning time. We tested for these conditioning effects (priming and adaptation) using an ambiguous Necker Cube and an ambiguous Letter /Number stimulus as test stimuli and unambiguous variants thereof as conditioning stimuli. In a second experimental condition, we tested whether the previous imagination of an unambiguous conditioning stimulus variant – instead of its observation – can have similar conditioning effects on the subsequent test stimulus. We found no systematic conditioning effect on the group level, neither for the two stimulus types (Necker Cube stimuli and Letter /Number stimuli) nor for the two conditions (Real and Imaginary). However, significant correlations between effects of Real and Imaginary Condition were observed for both stimulus types. The absence of conditioning effects at the group level may be explained by using only one conditioning time, which may fit with individual priming and adaptation constants of some of our participants but not of others. Our strong correlation results indicate that observers with clear conditioning effects have about the same type (priming or adaptation) and intensity of imaginary conditioning effects. As a consequence, not only past perceptual experiences but also past imaginations can influence our current percepts. This is further confirmation that the mechanisms underlying perception and imagination are similar. Our post-hoc qualitative observations from three self-defined aphantasic observers indicate that our paradigm may be a promising objective measure to identify aphantasia.

Phantasia, aphantasia, and hyperphantasia: empirical data and conceptual considerations

Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes

Probing the unimaginable: The impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception

A Systematic Review of Aphantasia: Concept, Measurement, Neural Basis, and Theory Development

An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

Insights into embodied cognition and mental imagery from aphantasia

Latent Profiles of Visual Imagery: Aphantasics, Mid-Range Imagers, and Hyperphantasics Experience Reading Differently

Imagine, and you will find – Lack of attentional guidance through visual imagery in aphantasics

Beyond Visual Constraints: Interdisciplinary Exploration of Aphantasia

Visual mental imagery in typical imagers and in aphantasia: A millimeter-scale 7-T fMRI study

Aphantasia and autism: An investigation of mental imagery vividness

Imagery agnosia and its phenomenology

The role of visual imagery in face recognition and the construction of facial composites. Evidence from Aphantasia

The behavioral performance and cortical structural properties of aphantasia

Deep Aphantasia: a visual brain with minimal influence from priors or inhibitory feedback?

The critical role of mental imagery in human emotion: insights from fear-based imagery and aphantasia

Visual imagination can influence visual perception – towards an experimental paradigm to measure imagination

Revisiting the blind mind: still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia

Quantifying Aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory

Imageless imagery in aphantasia: decoding non-sensory imagery in aphantasia

No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: Visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces