Abstract:Different individuals experience varying degrees of vividness in their visual mental images. The distribution of these variations across different imagery domains, such as object shape, color, written words, faces, and spatial relationships, remains unknown. To address this issue, we conducted a study with 117 healthy participants who reported different levels of imagery vividness. Of these participants, 44 reported experiencing absent or nearly absent visual imagery, a condition known as "aphantasia". These individuals were compared to those with typical (N = 42) or unusually vivid (N = 31) imagery ability. We used an online version of the French-language Battérie Imagination-Perception (eBIP), which consists of tasks tapping each of the above-mentioned domains, both in visual imagery and in visual perception. We recorded the accuracy and response times (RTs) of participants' responses. Aphantasic participants reached similar levels of accuracy on all tasks compared to the other groups (Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA, BF = .02). However, their RTs were slower in both imagery and perceptual tasks (BF = 266), and they had lower confidence in their responses on perceptual tasks (BF = 7.78e5). A Bayesian regression analysis revealed that there was an inverse correlation between subjective vividness and RTs for the entire participant group: higher levels of vividness were associated with faster RTs. The pattern was similar in all the explored domains. The findings suggest that individuals with congenital aphantasia experience a slowing in processing visual information in both imagery and perception, but the precision of their processing remains unaffected. The observed performance pattern lends support to the hypotheses that congenital aphantasia is primarily a deficit of phenomenal consciousness, or that it employs alternative strategies other than visualization to access preserved visual information.

Public-academic partnerships: evidence-based implementation: the role of sustained community-based practice and research partnerships.

Phantasia, aphantasia, and hyperphantasia: empirical data and conceptual considerations

Probing the unimaginable: The impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception

Insights into embodied cognition and mental imagery from aphantasia

Visual mental imagery in typical imagers and in aphantasia: A millimeter-scale 7-T fMRI study

Imagine, and you will find – Lack of attentional guidance through visual imagery in aphantasics

The Neural Underpinnings of Aphantasia: A Case Study of Identical Twins

Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes

A Study of Fractional Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation in Schizophrenia Patients with Persistent Verbal Auditory Hallucinations

Grey Matter Volume Reduction in the Frontotemporal Cortex Associated with Persistent Verbal Auditory Hallucinations in Chinese Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: Insights from a 3 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Metacognitive Awareness and the Subjective Experience of Remembering in Aphantasia

A Conceptual Framework of Cognitive-Affective Theory of Mind: Towards a Precision Identification of Mental Disorders

Commentary: rename our field allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology.

Hippocampal-occipital connectivity reflects autobiographical memory deficits in aphantasia

Revisiting the blind mind: still no evidence for sensory visual imagery in individuals with aphantasia

Quantifying Aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory

Deep Aphantasia: a visual brain with minimal influence from priors or inhibitory feedback?

The role of visual imagery in face recognition and the construction of facial composites. Evidence from Aphantasia

No clear evidence of a difference between individuals who self-report an absence of auditory imagery and typical imagers on auditory imagery tasks

Mental imagery: The role of primary visual cortex in aphantasia