Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to estimate the effectiveness of the credit evaluation system using the borrowing data from China’s leading P2P lending platform, Renrendai.com. Design/methodology/approach The current credit valuation systems are classified into the forward-looking mechanism, which judges the borrowers’ credit levels based on their uploaded information, and the backward-looking mechanism, which judges the borrowers’ credit levels based on their historical repayment performance. Probit models and Tobit models are used to examine the effectiveness of credit evaluation mechanisms. Findings The results show that only the “hard” information reflecting borrowers’ credit ability can explain the default risk on the platform under the forward-looking credit evaluation mechanism. The backward-looking credit evaluation mechanism (BCEM) based on the repeated borrowings produces both promise-enhancing and “fishing” incentives and thus fails to explain the default risk, and weakens the effectiveness of forward-looking credit indicators in explaining the default risk because it encourages borrowers to invest in forging forward-looking credit indicators. Additional information such as the interest rate and the repayment periods reveals borrowers’ credit and thus can also be used as a predictor of borrowers’ default risk. Practical implications The findings suggest that current ex ante screening based on the information collected from the borrowers or repeated borrowings is inadequate to control the default risk in P2P lending markets and thus needs be improved. Ex post monitoring and sharing on defaulter’s information should be strengthened to increase the default cost and thus to deter potential bad borrowers. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper classifying the credit evaluation system in online P2P lending market into the forward-looking type and the backward-looking type, which is important since they provide different incentives to borrowers. The paper also investigates and provides evidence on the promise-enhancing and “fishing” incentives of BCEMs.

Like a moth to a flame: Do stock market bubbles exacerbate credit risks of peer‐to‐peer lending?

Survival or Die: a Survival Analysis on Peer‐to‐peer Lending Platforms in China

Evaluating the Regulatory Scheme for Internet Finance in China: the Case of Peer-to-peer Lending

Stock Pledged Loans and Market Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Risk Preference of the Investors and the Risk of Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform

Riding the Credit Boom

Policy Uncertainty and Household Credit Access: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding

Factors Affecting Platform Default Risk in Online Peer-to-peer (P2P) Lending Business: an Empirical Study Using Chinese Online P2P Platform Data

Forward Looking Versus Backward Looking: An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Credit Evaluation System in China's Online P2P Lending Market

Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending

Social Heterogeneity and Local Bias in Peer-to-peer Lending – Evidence from China

Numerological Heuristics and Credit Risk in Peer-to-Peer Lending

Network topology and systemic risk in Peer-to-Peer lending market

Macroeconomics and FinTech: Uncovering Latent Macroeconomic Effects on Peer-to-Peer Lending

Disparity and Discrimination in Consumer Credit Markets: Evidence from Online Peer-to-peer Lending

Forward Looking Vs Backward Looking

Role of Diversification Risk in Financial Bubbles

Understanding Lenders' Investment Behavior in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending: A Construal Level Theory Perspective

Leverage-Induced Fire Sales and Stock Market Crashes

Moral hazard in online peer-to-peer lending

Extreme risk spillovers among traditional financial and FinTech institutions: A complex network perspective