Abstract:Background: Moral evaluation is identified as the first stage in the theory of moral judgment, and academics believe that it may align with the social intuitionist model. This study aims to prove that the model's emotional dominance hypothesis applies to moral evaluation by presenting a computational decision-making model that mathematically formalizes this emotional dominance decision-making process. We also compared different types of valence evaluation tasks to test the emotional priority hypothesis. Methods: We used a convenience sampling method to randomly recruit 30 enrolled college students. The drift-diffusion model was employed to analyze reaction times for words with various emotional and moral valences Additionally, we designed different valence evaluation tasks based on the response relevance hypothesis and evaluated the processing order through reaction time comparisons. Results: The analysis revealed that the emotional mechanism of immoral evaluation differs from moral evaluation. An increase in emotional valence accelerates the speed of evidence accumulation (v) for moral evaluation (M = 1.21, 0.2% < 0 < 99.8%) but lowers decision caution (a) in immoral evaluation (M = −0.64, 96.1% < 0 < 3.9%). In contrast, moral valence does not have a significant influence on evaluation processes (v, M = −0.28, 72.1% < 0 < 27.9%; a, M = −0.32, 79.3% < 0 < 20.7%). Furthermore, We found no significant difference in reaction times between moral and immoral words in the emotional evaluation task (F(1,29) = 0.55, p = 0.464, partial η2 = 0.02), but a significant difference existed in the moral evaluation task (F(1,29) = 17.99, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.38), indicating that the tendency of relatively fast immoral evaluation in emotional evaluation tasks may be caused by emotional priority. Conclusions: Our findings support the intuitive model's emotional dominance hypothesis and introduce a new emotional mechanism into moral evaluation. This study clarifies the distinct emotional processes in moral and immoral evaluations, fills a gap in the research on moral evaluation, and offers insights into human decision-making in moral contexts.

The affective gradient hypothesis: an affect-centered account of motivated behavior

Temporal Distance,Automatic Activation of Self-discrepancy and Value Orientation

Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations

A biased activation theory of the cognitive and attentional modulation of emotion

Affect as a Decision-Making System of the Present

Hidden Reward: Affect and Its Prediction Errors as Windows Into Subjective Value

An expectancy-value model of emotion regulation: Implications for motivation, emotional experience, and decision making.

The rise of affectivism

Motivational intensity modulates the effects of positive emotions on set shifting after controlling physiological arousal

Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivational states

Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model

Proximity to rewards modulates parameters of effortful control exertion.

The role of affective experience in work motivation: Test of a conceptual model

Affect-congruent attention modulates generalized reward expectations

Making sense of feelings

Affective Dynamics in Temporal Self-Regulation Theory

The role of affective states in the process of goal setting

The spread of affective and semantic valence representations across states

The impact of emotional valence on generalization gradients

Computational and neural mechanisms underlying the influence of action affordances on value learning

How Do Values Affect Behavior? Let Me Count the Ways