Abstract:Background: Health promotion and chronic disease management both require behavior change, but people find it hard to change behavior despite having good intentions. The problem arises because patients' narratives about experiences and intentions are filtered through memory and language. These narratives inaccurately reflect intuitive decision-making or actual behaviors. Objectives: We propose a principle-temporal immediacy-as a moderator variable that explains which of two mental systems (narrative or intuitive) will be activated in any given situation. We reviewed multiple scientific areas to test temporal immediacy as an explanation for findings. Methods: In an iterative process, we used evidence from philosophy, cognitive neuroscience, behavioral economics, symptom science, and ecological momentary assessment to develop our theoretical perspective. These perspectives each suggest two cognitive systems that differ in their level of temporal immediacy: an intuitive system that produces behavior in response to everyday states and a narrative system that interprets and explains these experiences after the fact. Findings: Writers from Plato onward describe two competing influences on behavior-often with moral overtones. People tend to identify with the language-based narrative system and blame unhelpful results on the less accessible intuitive system, but neither is completely rational, and the intuitive system has strengths based on speed and serial processing. The systems differ based on temporal immediacy-the description of an experience as either "now" or "usually"-with the intuitive system generating behaviors automatically in real time and the narrative system producing beliefs about the past or future. Discussion: The principle of temporal immediacy is a tool to integrate nursing science with other disciplinary traditions and to improve research and practice. Interventions should build on each system's strengths, rather than treating the intuitive system as a barrier for the narrative system to overcome. Nursing researchers need to study the roles and effects of both systems.

Affective Dynamics in Temporal Self-Regulation Theory

Temporal Self-Regulation Theory: Integrating Biological, Psychological, and Ecological Determinants of Health Behavior Performance

Neural Responses During Emotion Transitions and Emotion Regulation

Temporal Distance,Automatic Activation of Self-discrepancy and Value Orientation

The role of executive functioning on the intention-behaviour relationship of health behaviours: a temporal self-regulatory perspective

Prefrontal-posterior coupling mediates emotion transitions and their influence on executive function

Stable and momentary psychosocial correlates of everyday smoking: An application of Temporal Self-Regulation Theory

Emotion: the Self-regulatory Sense

Affective Determinants of Physical Activity: A Conceptual Framework and Narrative Review

Temporal Immediacy: A Two-System Theory of Mind for Understanding and Changing Health Behaviors

Clarifying the importance and moderating roles of temporal self-regulation theory across behaviour types

Short-term implications of long-term thinking: Temporal distancing and emotional responses to daily stressors.

A self-regulation perspective on how and when regulatory focus differentially relates to citizenship behaviors.

Affect as a Decision-Making System of the Present

The role of affect dynamics as mechanisms of change in mental health interventions: Integrating applied and basic science.

Outcome prediction in psychological therapy with continuous time dynamic modeling of affective states and emotion regulation.

On the Dynamic Interplay between Positive and Negative Affects

Mediation, moderation, and context: Understanding complex relations among cognition, affect, and health behaviour

Flourishing and integrative emotion regulation: an SDT perspective

Daily life affective dynamics as transdiagnostic predictors of mental health symptoms: An ecological momentary assessment study

Emotion, rationality, and decision-making: how to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory