Abstract:Background: A totally implanted venous access port (TIVAP) in the upper arm is a safe and cost-effective vascular access device and is widely used in breast cancer patients. Traditional tunnelling technique increases the operation time and has an unsatisfied cosmetic effect, so we explored the feasibility, cosmetic effect and complications of an upper arm port with a novel incision in this retrospective study. Methods: We reviewed 489 cases of totally implantable venous access port implantation in the upper arm with two types of incisions in our centre from 1 January 2018 to 30 January 2022. The patients were divided into two different incision groups including the puncture site incision group (n = 282) and the conventional tunnelling group (n = 207). The comparison of the results was collected between the two groups, and contributing factors were analyzed for major complications. Results: A total of 489 patients were successfully implanted with arm ports using the puncture site incision technique (n = 282, 57.7%) and conventional tunnelling technique (n = 207, 42.3%). The average operation time of the two types of incisions was 36.5 ± 15 min in the puncture site incision group and 55 ± 18.1 min in the tunnel needle group (P < 0.05). In terms of complications, 33 catheter-related complications occurred (6.4%), including 9 cases of infection, 15 cases of catheter-related thrombosis and 7 cases of skin exposure. Fourteen patients in the puncture site incision group developed complications compared with 17 in the traditional incision group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of overall complication events (5.0% and 8.2%, P = 0.145) while the same result was found in each complication event. Weight, total cholesterol and diabetes were found to be associated with device-related infections in the univariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Diabetes was found to be associated with device-related infections in multivariate analysis while hypertension was associated with thrombosis. Conclusions: The puncture site incision method is a novel technique with a better cosmetic appearance and less operation time than the traditional tunnelling technique, providing a comparable overall rate of complications. It offers a preferable choice for clinicians when dealing with different situations of patients. It is worthy of being used and promoted for patients requiring the totally implanted venous access port in the upper arm.

Evaluation of a novel central venous access port for direct catheter insertion without a peel-away sheath

[Clinical application of totally implantable central venous port]

Effect and Safety of an Innovative Improved Totally implanted venous access port (TIVAP) Implantation (Noninvasive Chest Wall Implantation) via the Axillary Approach on Patients with Breast Cancer

Preoperative animated videos reduce education time and increase content awareness for patients with digital subtraction angiography-guided implantable venous access ports

Totally implantable venous ports in infants and children: a single-center retrospective study of indications and safety

Venous access ports: indications, implantation technique, follow-up, and complications

The utilization of guidewires for adjusting the intraoperative catheter malposition during the venous access port implantation: A retrospective study

Feasibility of totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm for patients with head and neck cancer in the modern era of chemotherapy

A Stepwise Interventional Strategy for the Removal of Adherent Totally Implanted Central Venous Access Port Catheters

Application of pocket-first technique for implantation of totally implantable venous access ports

Feasibility and Safety of the Direct Occluded Vessel Puncture Technique as a New Access Site for Complex Peripheral Artery Occlusive Disease

A novel incision technique of a totally implanted venous access port in the upper arm for patients with breast cancer

Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer

Practical use of the central venous access port for contrast-enhanced CT: comparison with peripheral intravenous access regarding enhancement and safety

Safety and Efficiency of Cephalic Vein Puncture by Modified Seldinger Technique Compared to Subclavian Vein Puncture for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Risk factors for infection of totally implantable central venous access ports among patients requiring port removal

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Implantable Venous Access Port-Related and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Complications in Patients with Hematological Malignancies in China

Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial

Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?

Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management

Surgical technique: placement of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through a cephalic vein cutdown in pediatric patients