Abstract:Purpose Bioceramic coatings have been shown to promote bone repair, which aids in the early integration of implants. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of air abrasion with a bioceramic abrasive on the surface characteristics of different implant materials and surfaces. The dissolution of the applied treatment from the surfaces over 3 weeks was also assessed. Materials and Methods Discs of three alloys used for dental implants were studied and compared: two types of commercially pure titanium (CpTi)/ (CpTi SLActive) and titanium‐zirconia (TiZr). The tested surfaces were: CpTi control (CpC), sandblasted (SB), sandblasted and acid‐etched (SBE), and CpTi SLActive®, (TiZr) Roxolid®. Three discs from each group underwent air abrasion with apatite bioceramic powders, 95% hydroxyapatite (HA)/5% calcium oxide (CaO), and 90% hydroxyapatite (HA)/10% calcium oxide (CaO). The treated discs were surface characterized by optical profilometry to obtain surface roughness, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) to compare element weight percentages of titanium, calcium, and phosphate. Dissolution was assessed using inductively coupled plasma optic emission spectrometry (ICP‐OES). Results Bioceramic powders were deposited on all tested surfaces leading to changes in surface characteristics. The only statistically significant differences between the material groups for surface roughness were found with 95% HA/5% CaO powder in the Sp and Rp parameters (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). There were no significant differences in the Ca and P wt% between all groups and powders 95% HA/5% CaO and 90% HA/10% CaO (p = 0.14, 0.18, and p = 0.15, 0.12, respectively). A non‐uniform dispersion of the treatment on the surface layer was visible on all treated surfaces. The bioceramic powder continued to dissolute from the tested surfaces for 3 weeks. Conclusion Bioceramic abrasion modifies implant surface characteristics, although the change in surface characteristics resulting from such treatment was not influenced by the implant material or surface treatment. Air abrasion with hydroxyapatite and calcium oxide bioceramics leaves powder deposits on the treated implant surfaces that could potentially influence the healing of implants affected by peri‐implantitis.

The effect of using Al_2O_3 and TiO_2 in sandblasting of titanium dental implants

Positive Biomechanical Effects of Titanium Oxide for Sandblasting Implant Surface as an Alternative to Aluminium Oxide

Early bone response to sandblasted, dual acid-etched and H2O2/HCl treated titanium implants: an experimental study in the rabbit

Relevant Aspects of Titanium and Zirconia Dental Implants for Their Fatigue and Osseointegration Behaviors

Cell Response of Titanium Implant with a Roughened Surface Containing Titanium Hydride: an in Vitro Study

Change of Compressive Strength Ti-6al-4v Sandblasted Al2O3 50μm Post Dynamic Pressure Treatment In vitro

The Impact of Al2O3 Particles from Grit-Blasted Ti6Al7Nb (Alloy) Implant Surfaces on Biocompatibility, Aseptic Loosening, and Infection

Bone Responses to Titanium Implants Surface-Roughened by Sandblasted and Double Etched Treatments in a Rabbit Model.

Effect of Electrochemically Deposited Nanohydroxyapatite on Bone Bonding of Sandblasted/Dual Acid-Etched Titanium Implant

In Vitro and in Vivo Studies of Ultrafine-Grain Ti As Dental Implant Material Processed by ECAP

Biological and Biomechanical Behavior of Titanium Implants with Fluoridated Hydroxyapatite Coatings

Effect of H2O2/HCl Heat Treatment of Implants on in Vivo Peri-Implant Bone Formation.

Effect of bioceramic powder abrasion on different implant surfaces

In vitro biological effects of titanium rough surface obtained by calcium phosphate grid blasting

Effects of Surface Treatment Method Forming New Nano/Micro Hierarchical Structures on Attachment and Proliferation of Osteoblast-like Cells

Studying the Biocompatibility of Implant Titanium Alloy after Surface Treatment by Sandblasting and Etching

THE EFFECTS OF MODIFIED SANDBIASTING SURFACE TREATMENT ON THE PHYSIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TITANIUM SURFACE

Impact of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, Sandblast, and Acid Etching Surface Modification on Surface Topography of Biodental Titanium Implants.

Biomechanical and Histologic Evaluation of Osseointegration of Titanium Dental Implants Modified by Various Combinations of Sandblasting, Acid-Etching, Hydroxyapatite, and Hyaluronic Acid Coating Techniques.

The Biological Impact of Residual Aluminum Particles on Sand-Blasted Dental Implant Surfaces: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies

The Effects of Sanding Acid Etch Treatment of Ti-6Al-7Nb Surface on Rat Osteoblasts