Abstract:IntroductionBatch effects in large untargeted metabolomics experiments are almost unavoidable, especially when sensitive detection techniques like mass spectrometry (MS) are employed. In order to obtain peak intensities that are comparable across all batches, corrections need to be performed. Since non-detects, i.e., signals with an intensity too low to be detected with certainty, are common in metabolomics studies, the batch correction methods need to take these into account.ObjectivesThis paper aims to compare several batch correction methods, and investigates the effect of different strategies for handling non-detects.MethodsBatch correction methods usually consist of regression models, possibly also accounting for trends within batches. To fit these models quality control samples (QCs), injected at regular intervals, can be used. Also study samples can be used, provided that the injection order is properly randomized. Normalization methods, not using information on batch labels or injection order, can correct for batch effects as well. Introducing two easy-to-use quality criteria, we assess the merits of these batch correction strategies using three large LC–MS and GC–MS data sets of samples from Arabidopsis thaliana.ResultsThe three data sets have very different characteristics, leading to clearly distinct behaviour of the batch correction strategies studied. Explicit inclusion of information on batch and injection order in general leads to very good corrections; when enough QCs are available, also general normalization approaches perform well. Several approaches are shown to be able to handle non-detects—replacing them with very small numbers such as zero seems the worst of the approaches considered.ConclusionThe use of quality control samples for batch correction leads to good results when enough QCs are available. If an experiment is properly set up, batch correction using the study samples usually leads to a similar high-quality correction, but has the advantage that more metabolites are corrected. The strategy for handling non-detects is important: choosing small values like zero can lead to suboptimal batch corrections.

Correcting batch effects in large-scale multiomics studies using a reference-material-based ratio method

Assessing and mitigating batch effects in large-scale omics studies

Assessment of batch-correction methods for scRNA-seq data with a new test metric

A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data

Ratio-based quantitative multiomics profiling using universal reference materials empowers data integration

Thinking points for effective batch correction on biomedical data

Case-specific selection of batch correction methods for integrating single-cell transcriptomic data from different sources

Improved batch correction in untargeted MS-based metabolomics

Multi-omics data integration using ratio-based quantitative profiling with Quartet reference materials

A test metric for assessing single-cell RNA-seq batch correction

Removing Batch Effects in Analysis of Expression Microarray Data: an Evaluation of Six Batch Adjustment Methods

Batch correction methods used in single cell RNA-sequencing analyses are often poorly calibrated

Evaluating batch correction methods for image-based cell profiling

Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling

Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors

A Novel Strategy for Large-Scale Metabolomics Study by Calibrating Gross and Systematic Errors in Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

Normalization Approach by a Reference Material to Improve LC-MS-Based Metabolomic Data Comparability of Multibatch Samples.

SSBER: removing batch effect for single-cell RNA sequencing data

AMDBNorm: an approach based on distribution adjustment to eliminate batch effects of gene expression data

Fast-scBatch: Batch Effect Correction Using Neural Network-Driven Distance Matrix Adjustment

Overcoming the impacts of two-step batch effect correction on gene expression estimation and inference