Abstract:In epidemiological cohort studies, the relative risk (also known as risk ratio) is a major measure of association to summarize the results of two treatments or exposures. Generally, it measures the relative change in disease risk as a result of treatment application. Standard approaches to estimating relative risk available in common software packages may produce biased inference when applied to correlated binary data collected from longitudinal or clustered studies. In recent years, several methods for estimating the risk ratio for correlated binary data have been published, some of which maintain a well-controlled coverage probability but do not maintain an appropriate interval width or the interval location to measure the balance between distal and mesial noncoverage probabilities accurately or, vice versa. This paper develops efficient and straightforward inference procedures for estimating a confidence interval for risk ratio based on a hybrid method. In general, the hybrid method combines two separate confidence intervals for two single risk rates to form a hybrid confidence interval for their ratio. Additionally, we propose the procedures for constructing a confidence interval for risk ratio that directly extends recently recommended methods for correlated binary data by building on the concepts of the design effect and effective sample sizes typically used in representative sample surveys. In order to investigate the performance of these proposed methods, we conduct an extensive simulation study. To demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods, we present three examples from real-life applications, comparing the side effects of low-dose tricyclic antidepressants with a placebo, the efficacy of the treatment group in a teratological experiment, and the efficiency of the active drugs in curing infection for clinical trials.

Interval estimation of common risk difference for stratified unilateral and bilateral data✩

Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data

Interval estimation of relative risks for combined unilateral and bilateral correlated data

Risk difference tests for stratified binary data under Dallal's model

Confidence Intervals for Ratios of Proportions in Stratified Bilateral Correlated Data

Testing the homogeneity of odds ratio across strata for combined bilateral and unilateral data

Simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one of proportion ratios of bilateral correlated data

Accurate interval estimation for the risk difference in an incomplete correlated 2 × 2 table: Calf immunity analysis.

Testing the Equality of Proportions for Combined Unilateral and Bilateral Data

Homogeneity Test of Ratios of Two Proportions in Stratified Bilateral and Unilateral Data

Testing Homogeneity of Proportion Ratios for Stratified Bilateral Correlated Data

An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions

Semiparametric empirical likelihood confidence intervals for the difference of areas under two correlated ROC curves under density ratio model

Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Marginal Hazard Rates of Paired Survival Times

A comparison of Bayesian and score methods for interval estimates of positive/negative likelihood ratios in support of diagnostic device performance evaluation

The impact of clustering binary data on relative risk towards a study of inferential methods

Formulas, Algorithms and Examples for Binomial Distributed Data Confidence Interval Calculation: Excess Risk, Relative Risk and Odds Ratio

An optimal exact interval for the risk ratio in the 2×2 table with structural zero

Estimating confidence regions of common measures of (baseline, treatment effect) on dichotomous outcome of a population

Comparison of tests for categorical data from a stratified cluster randomized trial