Abstract:Introduction: Logistic regression models are frequently used to estimate measures of association between an exposure, health determinant or intervention, and a binary outcome. However, when the outcome is frequent (> 10%), model estimates for relative risks and prevalence ratios might be biased. Despite the availability of several alternatives, many still rely on these models, and a consensus is yet to be reached. We aimed to compare the estimation and goodness-of-fit of logistic, log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models, in cross-sectional studies involving frequent binary outcomes. Methods: Two cross-sectional studies were conducted. Study 1 was a nationally representative study on the impact of air pollution on mental health. Study 2 was a local study on immigrants' access to urgent healthcare services. Odds ratios (OR) were obtained through logistic regression, and prevalence ratios (PR) through log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models. Confidence intervals (CI), their ranges, and standard-errors (SE) were also computed, along with models' relative goodness-of-fit through Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), when applicable. Results: In Study 1, the OR (95% CI) was 1.015 (0.970 - 1.063), while the PR (95% CI) obtained through the robust Poisson mode was 1.012 (0.979 - 1.045). The log-binomial regression model did not converge in this study. In Study 2, the OR (95% CI) was 1.584 (1.026 - 2.446), the PR (95% CI) for the log-binomial model was 1.217 (0.978 - 1.515), and 1.130 (1.013 - 1.261) for the robust Poisson model. The 95% CI, their ranges, and the SE of the OR were higher than those of the PR, in both studies. However, in Study 2, the AIC value was lower for the logistic regression model. Conclusion: The odds ratio overestimated PR with wider 95% CI and higher SE. The overestimation was greater as the outcome of the study became more prevalent, in line with previous studies. In Study 2, the logistic regression was the model with the best fit, illustrating the need to consider multiple criteria when selecting the most appropriate statistical model for each study. Employing logistic regression models by default might lead to misinterpretations. Robust Poisson models are viable alternatives in cross-sectional studies with frequent binary outcomes, avoiding the non-convergence of log-binomial models.

Estimating confidence regions of common measures of (baseline, treatment effect) on dichotomous outcome of a population

Bootstrap method-based estimation on the confidence interval for additive interaction in cohort studies

Modified Poisson Regression Model for Data of Prospective Studies with Common Outcomes

Improved Estimation of Population Mean Through Known Conventional and Non-Conventional Measures of Auxiliary Variable

Point and interval estimation of exposure effects and interaction between the exposures based on logistic model for observational studies

Measuring and estimating interaction between exposures on dichotomous outcome of a population

Formulas, Algorithms and Examples for Binomial Distributed Data Confidence Interval Calculation: Excess Risk, Relative Risk and Odds Ratio

Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

Confidence Intervals for Ratios of Proportions in Stratified Bilateral Correlated Data

Interval estimation of relative risks for combined unilateral and bilateral correlated data

Combining estimates of the odds ratio: the state of the art

A Potential Outcomes, and Typically More Powerful, Alternative to 'Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel'

An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions

Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Superiority Effect Size Measure and the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

Logistic Regression: Limitations in the Estimation of Measures of Association with Binary Health Outcomes

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects of Binary Treatments in Unconfounded Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes

Conditional Relative Risk: An association measure for longitudinal data analysis

Interval estimation of common risk difference for stratified unilateral and bilateral data✩

Risk projection for time-to-event outcome from population-based case–control studies leveraging summary statistics from the target population

Homogeneity tests and interval estimations of risk differences for stratified bilateral and unilateral correlated data

The impact of clustering binary data on relative risk towards a study of inferential methods