Resilience and its influencing factors after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in young and middle-aged patients with first acute myocardial infarction

Jinju Wang,Yafeng Wu,Juanjuan Zhou,Shaoman Li,Liping She
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59885-9
IF: 4.6
2024-04-26
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Mental health after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) influences the prognosis of patients. Resilience may contribute to improving a patient's mental health. However, no study has investigated resilience and its associated factors in young and middle-aged patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after the first AMI. This study aimed to identify critical associated factors influencing resilience in these patients. This cross-sectional study recruited 161 young and middle-aged patients with first-episode AMI using a purposive sampling method. These patients were assessed 48 h after emergency PCI using the General Information Questionnaire, the Connor—Davidson Resilience Scale—10, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale Civilian Version. Stepwise and logistic regression were conducted to analyze the factors influencing resilience. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to compare the area under the curves (AUC) for each indicator. The resilience of the 161 participants was 29.50 ± 4.158. Monthly household income, self-efficacy, social support, and post-traumatic stress disorder explained 51.4% of the variance in resilience. Self-efficacy ( OR 0.716, CI 0.589–0.870, P < 0.01) and social support (OR 0.772, CI 0.635–0.938, P < 0.01) were protective factors for psychological resilience, while post-traumatic stress disorder (OR 1.278, CI 1.077–1.515, P < 0.01) was a risk factor. ROC curve revealed that self-efficacy, social support, and PTSD had an AUC of 0.822, 0.855, and 0.889, respectively. Self-efficacy and social support improve, and PTSD degrades psychological resilience in young and middle-aged AMI patients undergoing emergency PCI.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the psychological resilience and its influencing factors in young and middle-aged patients experiencing their first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Specifically, the research objectives include: 1. **Assessing psychological resilience status**: Understanding the level of psychological resilience in these patients. 2. **Analyzing related factors**: Investigating the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, self-efficacy, social support, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with psychological resilience. 3. **Predicting factors of low psychological resilience**: Evaluating the predictive value of these factors for low psychological resilience using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. ### Research Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of death from cardiovascular diseases worldwide, affecting approximately 1 million people annually in China. Although AMI is generally considered to occur mainly in the elderly population, the incidence among younger patients has been increasing in recent years. The China Cardiovascular Health Report indicates that from 1990 to 2019, the incidence of AMI in the 25-44 age group increased by 36%, with about one-third of acute AMI patients being under 60 years old. Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a common method for treating AMI patients. However, this invasive surgery and the permanent stent implantation may cause various psychological issues in patients, such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which are associated with poor prognosis and high mortality rates. These issues may be more pronounced in the emergency PCI setting, where psychological stress can hinder patients from reintegrating into social and family life. ### Research Objectives 1. **Assessing psychological resilience**: Determining the level of psychological resilience in young and middle-aged first-time AMI patients after emergency PCI. 2. **Analyzing influencing factors**: Investigating the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics, self-efficacy, social support, and PTSD with psychological resilience. 3. **Predicting low psychological resilience**: Evaluating the predictive value of these factors for low psychological resilience. ### Research Methods - **Sample Selection**: Using purposive sampling, 161 first-time AMI patients aged 18-60 were recruited from the cardiac care unit (CCU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. - **Data Collection**: Data on the psychological state and condition stability of patients were collected within 48 hours after emergency PCI. - **Tools**: Assessments were conducted using the General Information Questionnaire, the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and the Civilian Version of the PTSD Checklist (PCL-C). - **Statistical Analysis**: Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26.0), and ROC curves were plotted using GraphPad Prism (version 9.0). ### Main Findings - **Psychological Resilience Level**: The average psychological resilience score of the 161 participants was 29.50 ± 4.158. - **Influencing Factors**: Monthly household income, self-efficacy, social support, and PTSD explained 51.4% of the variance in psychological resilience. Among these, self-efficacy (OR 0.716, CI 0.589–0.870, P < 0.01) and social support (OR 0.772, CI 0.635–0.938, P < 0.01) were protective factors, while PTSD (OR 1.278, CI 1.077–1.515, P < 0.01) was a risk factor. - **Predictive Value**: The ROC curve showed that the AUCs for self-efficacy, social support, and PTSD were 0.822, 0.855, and 0.889, respectively, with the combined variable having an AUC of 0.961. ### Conclusion In young and middle-aged first-time AMI patients, PTSD is the strongest predictor and risk factor for psychological resilience, followed by social support. Enhancing psychological resilience is crucial for improving the positive coping abilities of these patients after AMI. This study provides important evidence for developing interventions to enhance psychological resilience.