Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To study clinical effects of double plating through different approaches for communicated and obvious osteoporosis periprosthetic femoral fracture following total knee arthroplasty(TKA). METHODS:From July 2010 to June 2017, 21 patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture following TKA were divided into two groups according to operative approach. Fifteen patients in medial and lateral double approaches group, including 5 males and 10 females aged from 63 to 79 years old with an average of (67.2±5.9) years old; 11 patients were type 33-A2 and 4 patients were type 33-A3 according to AO-OTA classification; 12 patients injured by falling down and 3 patients by traffic accident; treated with double plating. Six patients in medial parapatellar approach group, including 3 males and 3 females, aged from 61 to 74 years old with an average of (64.6±6.0) years old; 3 patients were type 33-A2 and 3 patients were type 33-A3 according to AO-OTA classification; 5 patients injured by falling down and 1 patient by traffic accident; treated with double plating. Operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, fracture healing time were compared between two groups; HSS score and radiology at 3 and 12 months were compared between two groups. RESULTS:All patients were followed up, and the follow-up time of bilateral approaches group ranged from 12 to 18 months with an average of (14.2±2.6 ) months, while the follow-up time of single approach group ranged from 12 to 16 months with an average of (12.6±2.5) months, and there was no statistical difference between two groups. The operative time and postoperative drainage in bilateral approaches group were (107.2±10.4) min and (213.9±30.4) ml, while in sigle approach group was (95.4±12.8) min and (256.8±34.2) ml, and the differences were significant(P<0.05). There were no significant difference in blood loss and fracture healing time(P>0.05). HHS score at 3 and 12 months after operation in bilateral approach were 82.9±5.7 and 84.8±7.1, while in single approach group were 83.6±6.1 and 86.3±6.8; there was no statistical difference in HSS score between two groups(P>0.05). According to HSS score at 12 months after operation, 2 cases got excellent results and 13 good in bilateral approaches group; 1 case got excellent result and 4 good and 1 moderate in single approach group; but there was no statistical difference between two groups (χ²=2.625, P=0.105). There wase no significant differences in complications between bilateral approaches group(2 cases) and single approach group (1 case)(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Double plating technique for communicated and obvious osteoporosis periprosthetic femoral fracture following TKA could obtain good function of knee joint. The medial parapatellar approach has shorter operative time, while the bilateral approaches had less drainage.

Difference in the Extension Gap Between Osteoarthritis and Osteonecrosis in Medial Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with the Spacer Block Technique

Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults with Isolated Medial Osteoarthritis: A Matched Study Protocol.

[Double Plating Through Different Approaches for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty].

Therapeutic Effects Comparison and Revision Case Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients under 60 Years: A 2–6‐year Follow‐up Study

High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in advanced medial compartmental knee arthrosis: A comparative study with propensity score matched analysis

Clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the same patient

Comparison of Early Complication Rates After High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Biomechanical effects of femoral prosthesis misalignment on the structure of the lateral compartment during medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in osteoporotic patients

The Traditional Intramedullary Axis Underestimates the Medial Tibial Slope Compared to Transmalleolar Sagittal Axis in Image-based Robotic-Assisted Unicompartimental Knee Arthroplasty

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Finite element study of stress distribution in medial UKA under varied lower limb alignment

Accuracy of total knee arthroplasty using the modified gap technique based on the bone gap: an evaluation of the bone gap with a distal femoral trial component

Altered dynamic joint space in the lateral condyle compartment following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

The mid-term outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient

Are there functional biomechanical differences in robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Postoperative clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated medial compartmental osteoarthritis following medial meniscus posterior root tear

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of the Different Osteotomy Order in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The Impact of Arthroscopy on Surgical Decision-Making and Outcomes in Osteoarthritis Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty