Abstract:Academic research productivity relies upon the contribution of statisticians, who are typically clustered in statistics and biostatistics departments, isolated from clinical researchers. Most academic health centres have created consultation hubs or research incubators to make statisticians available for individual collaboration to support the clinical research enterprise. Additionally, some clinical departments within academic health centres have recognized the value in colocating statisticians within their clinical departments to improve availability for collaboration with physicians/researchers. Embedded statisticians encounter the same challenges of isolated statisticians regarding professional support and networking, mentorship and clear role expectations. While for all collaborative statisticians, it is important to effectively communicate value to both collaborators and supervisors, this may be especially problematic for embedded statisticians in clinical departments where their supervisors may not have backgrounds in research or statistics. Previous papers have reported valuable metrics for statisticians, particularly those associated with Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design Cores. There is a knowledge gap regarding metrics tailored to meet the needs of the embedded statistician and clinical supervisors. This paper is a first step towards addressing this important need. In this paper, we explore (1) the critical role of collaborative statisticians and the benefits and challenges of the embedded statistician model, (2) the need for additional metrics specific to embedded statisticians which measure value and (3) how to design a value report. We offer a framework for evaluation of the contributions of the embedded statistician with the following domains: (1) collaboration, (2) research output/productivity, (3) mentoring and (4) education. Metrics that are particularly specific to embedded statisticians and that are not routinely captured include time from project initiation to completion/outcome, time from initial statistical consultation to statistical outcome completion and summary of level of contribution for manuscripts and presentations in addition to author order. We conclude with thoughts on future directions for development of metrics and reporting systems for statisticians embedded in clinical departments.

The value of flexible funding for collaborative biostatistics units in universities and academic medical centres

Documenting and communicating the contributions of embedded statisticians: Show me the value!

Methods for building a staff workforce of quantitative scientists in academic health care

Considerations in developing a financial model for an academic statistical consulting centre

Using structured incentives to increase value for money in an academic health sciences centre

A guide to successful management of collaborative partnerships in quantitative research: An illustration of the science of team science

Accelerating resident research within quantitative collaboration units in academic healthcare

Working well with statisticians: Perceptions of practicing statisticians on their most successful collaborations

Teaching Communication in a Statistical Collaboration Course: A Feasible, Project-Based, Multimodal Curriculum

The impact of funding models on the integration of registered nurses in primary health care teams: protocol for a multi-phase mixed-methods study in Canada

A flexible parametric modelling framework for survival analysis

Biostatistics Cores: Improving the Chances for Funding

Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers

Flexible joint models for multivariate longitudinal and time-to-event data using multivariate functional principal components

Co-funding Hiring Model Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research at Pennsylvania State University

A flexible employee recruitment and compensation model: A bi-level optimization approach

Health and medical research funding agencies’ promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context

Modelling multiple time-scales with flexible parametric survival models

What is it that you say you do here? Advocating for the critical role of data scientists in research infrastructure

Incentive-Theoretic Bayesian Inference for Collaborative Science

Best practices to evaluate the impact of biomedical research software—metric collection beyond citations