Abstract:Participants tend to produce a higher or lower vocal pitch in response to upward or downward visual motion, suggesting a pitch–motion correspondence between the visual and speech production processes. However, previous studies were contaminated by factors such as the meaning of vocalized words and the intrinsic pitch or tongue movements associated with the vowels. To address these issues, we examined the pitch–motion correspondence between simple visual motion and pitched speech production. Participants were required to produce a high- or low-pitched meaningless single vowel [a] in response to the upward or downward direction of a visual motion stimulus. Using a single vowel, we eliminated the artifacts related to the meaning, intrinsic pitch, and tongue movements of multiple vocalized vowels. The results revealed that vocal responses were faster when the pitch corresponded to the visual motion (consistent condition) than when it did not (inconsistent condition). This result indicates that the pitch–motion correspondence in speech production does not depend on the stimulus meaning, intrinsic pitch, or tongue movement of the vocalized words. In other words, the present study suggests that the pitch–motion correspondence can be explained more parsimoniously as an association between simple sensory (visual motion) and motoric (vocal pitch) features. Additionally, acoustic analysis revealed that speech production aligned with visual motion exhibited lower stress, greater confidence, and higher vocal fluency. Participants tend to produce a higher or lower vocal pitch in response to upward or downward visual motion, suggesting a pitch–motion correspondence between the visual and speech production processes. However, previous studies were contaminated by factors such as the meaning of vocalized words and the intrinsic pitch or tongue movements associated with the vowels. To address these issues, we examined the pitch–motion correspondence between simple visual motion and pitched speech production. Participants were required to produce a high- or low-pitched meaningless single vowel [a] in response to the upward or downward direction of a visual motion stimulus. Using a single vowel, we eliminated the artifacts related to the meaning, intrinsic pitch, and tongue movements of multiple vocalized vowels. The results revealed that vocal responses were faster when the pitch corresponded to the visual motion (consistent condition) than when it did not (inconsistent condition). This result indicates that the pitch–motion correspondence in speech production does not depend on the stimulus meaning, intrinsic pitch, or tongue movement of the vocalized words. In other words, the present study suggests that the pitch–motion correspondence can be explained more parsimoniously as an association between simple sensory (visual motion) and motoric (vocal pitch) features. Additionally, acoustic analysis revealed that speech production aligned with visual motion exhibited lower stress, greater confidence, and higher vocal fluency.

High‐Pitched Sound is Open and Low‐Pitched Sound is Closed: Representing the Spatial Meaning of Pitch Height

Beethoven's last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context

Is Front associated with Above and Back with Below? Association between Allocentric Representations of Spatial Dimensions

Humans can use positive and negative spectrotemporal correlations to detect rising and falling pitch

Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation

Visual Upward/Downward Motion Elicits Fast and Fluent High-/Low-Pitched Speech Production

Intuitive visualizations of pitch and loudness in speech

Children's associations between space and pitch are differentially shaped by language

Synaesthetic interactions across vision and audition

When speech enhances Spatial Musical Association of Response Codes: Joint spatial associations of pitch and timbre in nonmusicians

Dynamics of pitch perception in the auditory cortex

Space-pitch associations differ in their susceptibility to language

Elucidating the influences of embodiment and conceptual metaphor on lexical and non-speech tone learning

The thickness of musical pitch: psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity

Musicians are more consistent: Gestural cross-modal mappings of pitch, loudness and tempo in real-time

Pitch is Not a Helix: Probing the Structure of Musical Pitch Across Tasks and Experience

Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of musicianship and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music

The effect of tone language background on cue integration in pitch perception

Categorical Perception of Mandarin Pitch Directions by Cantonese-Speaking Musicians and Non-musicians

Perceiving pitch absolutely: comparing absolute and relative pitch possessors in a pitch memory task

Humans (Homo sapiens) but not baboons (Papio papio) demonstrate crossmodal pitch‐luminance correspondence