Pitch is Not a Helix: Probing the Structure of Musical Pitch Across Tasks and Experience

Raja Marjieh,Thomas L. Griffiths,Nori Jacoby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.13.544763
2024-12-07
Abstract:Pitch perception is at the core of our experience of both speech and music, and understanding the appropriate representation of musical pitch has intrigued scholars for centuries. The pitch helix, which jointly represents logarithmic scaling of the periodicity of tones and the heightened similarity between tones separated by an octave has been widely assumed to be the underlying representation of pitch. Despite becoming default textbook material, the empirical basis of the pitch helix is highly limited due to small sample sizes and inadequate experimental designs. Drawing inspiration from representational similarity analysis in neuroscience, we revisit this problem through a series of nine experiments, involving participants with varied levels of musical expertise (N = 592), and paradigms covering both perception and production. We show that, depending on task and musical experience, the best geometrical approximation to the representation of pitch can exhibit an array of structures ranging from linear to double-helical structures, providing strong evidence that a simple helical representation cannot explain the data. Surprisingly, we also find that octave equivalence is strongest in the singing task despite being the most challenging due to production noise. These results suggest a new, broader understanding of how we perceive pitch.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?