Abstract:Introduction: The goal of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare orthodontic outcomes in patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion malocclusion treated with extraoral headgear or mini-implants for maximum anchorage. Materials: Forty-seven subjects with Angle Class II malocclusion or Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion were treated by retracting the maxillary dentoalveolar process by using the extraction space of the bilateral maxillary first premolars. Two anchorage systems were used. Group 1 (n = 22) received traditional anchorage preparation with a transpalatal arch and headgear; group 2 (n = 25) received mini-implants (miniplates, miniscrews, or microscrews) for bony anchorage. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were superimposed to compare the following parameters between groups: (1) amount of maxillary central incisor retraction, (2) reduction in maxillary central incisor angulation, (3) anchorage loss of the maxillary first molar, (4) movements of the maxillary central incisor and first molar in the vertical direction, and (5) changes in skeletal measurements representing the anteroposterior and vertical jaw relationships. Results: The skeletal anchorage group had greater anterior tooth retraction (8.17 vs 6.73 mm) and less maxillary molar mesialization (0.88 vs 2.07 mm) than did the headgear group, with a shorter treatment duration (29.81 vs 32.29 months). Translational movement of the incisors was more common than tipping movement, and intrusion of the maxillary dentition was greater, in patients receiving miniplates than in those receiving screw-type bony anchorage, resulting in counterclockwise rotation of the mandible and a statistically significant decrease in the mandibular plane angle. Cephalometric analysis of skeletal measurements in patients with low to average mandibular plane angles showed no significant difference between groups, although greater maxillary incisor retraction and less mesial movement of the first molar were noted in the mini-implant group. In patients with a high mandibular plane angle, those receiving skeletal anchorage had genuine intrusion of the maxillary first molar and reduction in the mandibular plane angle, whereas those receiving headgear anchorage had extrusion of the maxillary first molar and an increase of mandibular plane angle. In contrast to the posterior movement in the headgear group, anterior movement of Point A was noted in the mini-implant group. Conclusions: In both the anteroposterior and vertical directions, skeletal anchorage achieved better control than did the traditional headgear appliance during the treatment of maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Greater retraction of the maxillary incisor, less anchorage loss of the maxillary first molar, and the possibility of counterclockwise mandibular rotation all facilitated the correction of the Class II malocclusion.

Dental, skeletal and soft tissue changes after bimaxillary protrusion treatment with temporary anchorage devices using different retraction mechanics

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Treatment Effects and Post-Treatment Stability of Maxillary Molar Intrusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices in Open Bite Malocclusion

Histological analysis on tissues around orthodontically intruded maxillary molars using temporary anchorage devices: A case report

Clinical evaluation of the treatment of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with physiological anchorage control technique

Stability of the Maxillary and Mandibular Total Arch Distalization Using Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) in Adults

A comparative study on anterior teeth retraction-related hard and soft tissue changes with physiologic anchorage control technique

Occlusal Plane Changes after Maxillary Molar Distalization Using Temporary Skeletal Anchorages Devices: A Narrative Review and Preliminary Study

Three-Dimensional Digital Image Analysis of Skeletal and Soft Tissue Points A and B after Orthodontic Treatment with Premolar Extraction in Bimaxillary Protrusive Patients

Effects of transpalatal arch wire dimension and temporary skeletal anchorage device position on maxillary molar intrusion

The Biomechanics of Clear Aligners associated with temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSAD)

Dental Alveolar Effects of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Retraction with Implant Anchorage:A Computed Tomography Evaluation

Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes associated with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontics

Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment

Displacement in root apex and changes in incisor inclination affect alveolar bone remodeling in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients: a retrospective study

The Effect of Maxillary Molar Distalization with Clear Aligner: a 4D Finite-Element Study with Staging Simulation

The biomechanical effects of bimaxillary osteotomies to the patients with mandibular retraction under incisal clenching

Mandibular molar protraction: A comparison between fixed functional appliances and temporary anchorage devices

Camouflage Correction of Skeletal Class III Severe Open Bite with Tooth Ankylosis Treated by Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Case Report

Treating High Angle Bimaxillary Protrusion with Three Kinds of Extraction Method: A Clinical Study

Long-term changes in the anterior alveolar bone after orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction: a retrospective study.

Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion