Cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h in patients with a long cervix: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Rami Sammour,Elena Dikopoltsev,Shlomi Sagi,Dana Vitner,Inna Bleicher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15955
2024-10-26
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Abstract:Objective To examine whether cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h is as effective as 12 h in patients with a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound before induction of labor, and to determine whether patients with a long cervix need to have the balloon placed for a longer time. Methods This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between women undergoing cervical ripening with a double balloon device for 6 h (study group) versus 12 h (control group). In this secondary analysis, we included only patients who had cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on transvaginal ultrasound on admission. Our primary outcome was a Bishop score change after removal of the device. Secondary outcomes included insertion to delivery interval, mode of delivery, and oxytocin infusion duration. Results Sixty‐seven women met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 33 in the 6‐h group and 34 in the 12‐h group. Maternal characteristics were similar between both groups. Bishop score difference between the preinsertion and the postremoval scores were similar in the two groups (2.67 ± 1.8 vs. 2.53 ± 1.69, P = 0.76), while insertion to delivery time was 10 h shorter in the 6‐h group (20.95 vs. 31.21, P = 0.02; mean difference, −10.26 [95% CI, −19.0 to −1.51]). The other secondary outcomes remained similar in both groups. Conclusion In women undergoing induction of labor who have a cervical length ≥ 30 mm measured on admission transvaginal ultrasound, removing a double balloon device after 6 h achieved similar Bishop score changes as removal after 12 h, but significantly reduced the time to delivery. Registration at Clinical Trials https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03045939.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?