Comparison of balloon catheter, oral misoprostol, or combination of both for cervical ripening in late‐term and post‐term nulliparous women: A Finnish randomized controlled multicenter pilot trial
Heidi Kruit,Katariina Place,Kirsi Väyrynen,Maija‐Riitta Orden,Aydin Tekay,Marja Vääräsmäki,Jukka Uotila,Kati Tihtonen,Kirsi Rinne,Kaarin Mäkikallio,Seppo Heinonen,Leena Rahkonen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15034
2024-12-15
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Abstract:The randomized multicenter pilot trial, carried out in Finland between 2018 and 2022, compared the use of balloon catheter, oral misoprostol and the combined use of concurrent balloon catheter and oral misoprostol in late‐ and post‐term nulliparous women with unfavorable cervices. The combination use resulted in a shorter induction‐to‐delivery interval, with similar cesarean section rates and neonatal outcomes compared to using either method alone. Introduction Nulliparous women beyond term have high rates of induction failure. The aim of this study was to compare delivery outcomes for balloon catheter, misoprostol, and combination of both in nulliparous late‐ and post‐term women with unfavorable cervices. We intended to explore whether the combination strategy has lower cesarean section rate and is as safe as either method alone. Material and Methods The randomized multicenter pilot trial was carried out in the five university hospitals and the largest secondary care hospital of Finland March 1, 2018–March 31, 2022. A total of 273 nulliparous women with viable singleton fetus in cephalic presentation, intact amniotic membranes, and an unfavorable cervix at 41 + 0 gestational weeks were included. The study protocol was registered in the ISCTN registry (ISRCTN83219789). The women were randomized into cervical ripening by balloon catheter, oral misoprostol 50 μg every 4 h, or the combination use of both. The primary outcomes of the study were the rates of cesarean section and composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (5‐min Apgar score <7, umbilical artery pH ≤7.05, or NICU admission). Results Ninety‐seven women (35.5%) were allocated in the balloon catheter arm, 94 (34.4%) in the oral misoprostol arm, and 82 (30.0%) in the combination treatment arm. The rates of cesarean section (balloon catheter 23.7%, n = 23/97, vs. oral misoprostol 24.5%, n = 23/94, vs. combination 17.1%, n = 14/82) or composite adverse neonatal outcome (7.2% vs. 7.4% vs. 7.3%, respectively) were not statistically significantly different between the groups. The median (interquartile range) induction to delivery interval was the shortest in the combination treatment, 21.7 (15.1–33.2) h compared to balloon catheter 31.7 (21.9–44.5) h; p
obstetrics & gynecology